The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
The commandments enjoined by Moses were ordered to be written on the
stuccoed face of ‘great stones.’ Whether the whole of the Deuteronomic
legislation is meant is more than doubtful. But that the chief
enactments of the code should be thus placed before the eyes of the
people was in accordance with the customs of the age. The acts and
events of the reign of Augustus engraved on the marble slabs of Ancyra
are a late example of the same usage; and the great inscription of
Darius on the cliff of Behistun has similarly preserved to us the
history of the foundation of the Persian empire. To cover stone or rock
with stucco, which was then painted white and written upon, was a common
practice in Egypt. It seems to imply, however, that the writing could be
painted with the brush, and thus to exclude the use of cuneiform
characters. At the same time, these characters could be cut in stucco as
well as in stone, and it is possible that the stucco was intended to be
a substitute for clay, where a large surface had to be covered. However
this may be, the monument was ordered to be erected on Mount Ebal, by
the side of an altar of unwrought stones.
On Ebal, moreover, and the opposite height of Gerizim, it was prescribed
that a strange ceremony should be performed. While half the tribes stood
on the one mountain, and the other half on the other mountain, the
Levites were to curse from Ebal all those who disobeyed the law, and to
bless from Gerizim those who obeyed it.[252] Unfortunately, as might
have been expected, the curses much predominated over the blessings. We
hear afterwards in the book of Joshua that the ceremony was duly
performed, excepting only that Joshua read the words of cursing and
benediction in place of ‘the priests the Levites.’ Critics have doubted
the historical character of the occurrence, but it is inconsistent with
no known fact, and it is difficult to find a reason for its gratuitous
invention.
The latter part of the book of Deuteronomy brings the life of Moses to
an end. It includes the final covenant made between himself on behalf of
Yahveh and the people of Israel, to which are attached the various
calamities that would await the breaking of it. It also tells us that
the law contained in Deuteronomy was really written by the legislator,
and delivered to the priests the sons of Levi with an injunction that it
should be read every seventh year (xxxi. 9-11). Like the ‘witness’ to S.
John’s Gospel, therefore, the compiler of the Pentateuch in its present
form wishes to add his testimony to the belief that the Mosaic law was
written by Moses himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account