The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
It is, moreover, difficult to reconcile the statement that Hebron was
captured by Joshua after the defeat of the five kings with the narrative
of its capture by Caleb, which is given in detail elsewhere (Josh. xv.
13, 14; Judg. i. 9, 10). Here, as in other parts of the book of Joshua,
we find a tendency to ascribe the gradual occupation of Canaan to a
single point of time, and to assign all the successive conquests made in
it by the Israelites to the general who first led them across the
Jordan. The individual hero has absorbed all the victories gained by his
people, and the past has been foreshortened in the retrospect of the
later historian. As in the books of Kings the murder of Sennacherib is
made to follow immediately after his flight from Judah twenty years
before, so in the book of Joshua, the conquest of Canaan is all placed
in one age, the lifetime of the hero himself. As Moses was the lawgiver
of Israel and its deliverer from the house of bondage, posterity saw in
his successor the conqueror of Canaan.
It is noticeable, however, that neither Jerusalem nor Gezer is said to
have been taken after the battle of Makkedah. Both cities were doubtless
too strong to be attacked; and though Gezer was subsequently forced to
become the vassal of Ephraim, Jerusalem was destined to fall before a
Jewish and not an Ephraimitish leader.
The battle of Makkedah became the subject of a national song. It was
embodied, like David’s dirge over Saul and Jonathan, in the book of
Jashar, a fragment of which is quoted by the compiler of the book of
Joshua. ‘Sun, be thou still upon Gibeon, and thou, moon, in the valley
of Ajalon!’ cried Joshua, ‘in the sight of Israel,’ ‘when the Lord
delivered up the Amorites’ before them: ‘and the sun was still, and the
moon stayed until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies.’
So ran the words of the poem, and the prose historian seems to have
taken them literally.
The alliance with Gibeon and the destruction of Lachish opened the way
to the south. Westward, the sea-coast was in the hands of the
Philistines, whom the Israelites would have found more formidable
enemies than the disunited and effeminate Canaanites. The five
Philistine cities, accordingly, which had been but recently wrested from
Egyptian hands, were left untouched, and the Israelitish raiders made
their way into the Negeb towards the south-east, where they succeeded in
penetrating as far as Arad and Zephath. They had thus reached the very
spot where the first attempt to invade Canaan had failed, and from which
the disappointed tribes had been driven back again into the wilderness.
Zephath was not far distant from Kadesh-barnea, so that it is with a
pardonable exaggeration that the Jewish historian describes Joshua as
smiting his enemies ‘from Kadesh-barnea even unto Gaza’ (Josh. x. 41).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account