The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
It was a period of anarchy and perpetual war. Without a head, and
without cohesion, it seems strange that they did not perish utterly or
become absorbed by the older population of the land. That the nation
should have survived admits of only one explanation. It possessed a
common faith, a common sanctuary, and a common code of sacred laws. As
in Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire the Church preserved the
fabric of society, and eventually brought order out of chaos, so, too,
in ancient Israel, the nation owed its continued existence to the law
which had been given by Moses. Only the iron fetters of a written law,
with its organised priesthood and sanctions, and, above all, the
knowledge that it existed, could have prevented the process of political
and social disintegration from rapidly running its course. Had the
religion of Israel been merely that result of evolution which is dreamed
of by some modern writers, and the law of Moses the invention of a later
age, there would have been no Israel in which a religion could have
developed, or a code of laws have been compiled. The outward unity of
the tribes in Egypt and the desert was shattered by the settlement in
Canaan, and all that remained was the inward and religious unity that
had been forced upon them by the genius of an individual legislator. The
place of the political head and leader was supplied by the organised
cult and elaborate code of laws which he had bequeathed to the nation.
To all external appearance, indeed, Israel had ceased to be a nation,
and had been reduced to a scattered and anarchical collection of
marauding tribes; but the elements which could again bind them together
still existed—the belief in the same national God, the rites with which
He was worshipped, and the priesthood and sanctuary where the tradition
of the law was preserved.
That this is no imaginary picture is proved by the Song of Deborah. The
Song is admitted by the most sceptical of critics to belong to the age
to which it is assigned, and consequently to reflect the ideas of the
Israelite shortly after the settlement in Canaan. No composition of the
Exilic period could be more uncompromising in its monotheism, and its
assertion that Yahveh alone is the God of Israel. And the Song further
assumes that the tribes of Israel, disunited though they otherwise may
be, are nevertheless bound together by a common faith in the one
national God. Nor is this all. Israel still possesses, even among its
northern tribes, ‘legislators’ like Moses, and scribes who handle the
pen (Judg. v. 14). Writing, therefore, is still known and practised even
among a people so oppressed by their enemies that ‘the highways were
unoccupied,’ and the fellahin of the villages had ceased to exist. Laws,
too, were still promulgated in continuation of the laws of Moses, and
the people of Israel are ‘the people of the Lord.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account