The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
Two incidents have been recorded which throw a lurid light on the
manners and character of the age which immediately followed the
settlement in Canaan. In one of them we hear of a Levite of Mount
Ephraim ‘who took to him a concubine out of Beth-lehem in Judah.’
Phinehas, the grandson of Aaron, had succeeded his father Eleazar as
high-priest at Shiloh (Judg. xx. 28), where ‘the ark of the covenant’
had been placed. The concubine proved unfaithful to the Levite, and
eventually fled to her father’s house in Beth-lehem. Thither the Levite
followed her, and persuaded her to return with him to his home. The
woman’s father, however, highly pleased at the reconciliation, continued
to press his hospitality upon his guest, and it was not until the
afternoon of the fifth day that the Levite succeeded in getting away.
The evening soon fell upon him, and, rejecting the advice of his slave
that he should spend the night in Jerusalem, on the ground that it was
‘the city of a stranger,’ he pressed on with his concubine to Gibeah,
which belonged to Benjamin. It had been better for him, however, to have
sought hospitality from ‘the stranger’ rather than from his own people;
for, in spite of the fact that he had with him food in plenty both for
himself and for his asses, he was left to spend the night in the street.
But at the last moment an old man, who was not a native of Gibeah, came
in from his work in the fields, and seeing the Levite in the street,
asked him and his companions into the house. While they were eating and
drinking, the rabble gathered about the house and demanded that the man
should be brought out to them that they might ‘know him.’ It was a
repetition of the scene enacted in Sodom when the angels visited the
house of Lot, with the difference that the actors were Israelites
instead of Canaanites, whom the Hebrews had been called upon to destroy
for their sins. In vain ‘the master of the house’ intreated his
fellow-townsmen not to act ‘so wickedly,’ offering them his own daughter
as well as his guest’s concubine in place of the guest himself. Finally,
however, they were satisfied with the unfortunate concubine, whom they
‘abused’ all night, and then left dead on the doorstep of the house. The
first thing ‘her lord’ saw when he opened the door in the morning was
the woman’s corpse. This he placed on his ass and carried to his home,
where he divided it into twelve pieces, which he sent ‘into all the
coasts of Israel.’[281] The horror of the deed, or perhaps of the
visible proofs with which it was announced, aroused the Israelites, and
they demanded the punishment of the guilty. The crime had been committed
against a Levite, whose brethren were to be found wherever the
Israelites were settled, and who had on his side the priesthood of the
central sanctuary at Shiloh. He was, too, a Levite of Mount Ephraim, and
the sympathy of the powerful tribe of Ephraim was accordingly assured to
him. The Benjamites, however, refused to hand over their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account