The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
There was a special reason why Jerubbaal should thus have come forward
to deliver his countrymen from the Midianites. The Bedâwin raiders had
slain his brothers in a previous struggle at Mount Tabor (viii. 18-21).
Jerubbaal thus had a blood-feud to avenge. He was the last and
presumably the youngest of his family, and upon him therefore devolved
the duty of revenging his brothers’ death. Moreover, it would appear
from the words of the Midianite chiefs that Joash and his sons were not
only the heads of their clan, but that they also exercised a sort of
kingly authority in Ophrah and its neighbourhood. The history of
Abimelech seems to imply that the family of Abi-ezer had succeeded to
the power and even the name of the Canaanitish ‘kings’ of Shechem, and
that the subsequent ingratitude of the inhabitants of Shechem to the
house of Jerubbaal was due to jealousy of the preference displayed by it
for Ophrah. Shechem contained a large Canaanitish element which was
wanting at Ophrah, where the population was more purely Israelitish. If
Joash were thus king of a mixed population, recognised by Canaanites and
Israelites alike, we can understand why by the side of the altar of Baal
there stood also the symbol of the Canaanitish goddess. The very fact
that the sanctuary of Ophrah belonged to him (vi. 25) indicates that he
possessed royal prerogatives. Even at Jerusalem the temple of Solomon
was as it were the chapel of the kings.[339]
It has been suggested that the Baal whose altar stood on the land of
Joash at Ophrah was the Baal-berith or ‘Baal of the Covenant,’
worshipped at Shechem,[340] and that the ‘covenant’ over which the god
presided was that made between the Canaanites of Shechem and their
Hebrew master. Doubtless the two elements in the population would have
interpreted the name in a different way. For the Hebrews the ‘Baal of
the Covenant’ would have been Yahveh; for the Canaanites he would have
been the local sun-god. But there is nothing to prove that the
attributes of the Baals of Ophrah and Shechem were the same, or that
they were adored under the same form. Indeed, the fact that the altar
erected by Jerubbaal at Ophrah was dedicated to the ‘Yahveh of Peace’
tells rather in a contrary direction. Shechem had its Baal-berith, while
Ophrah may have had its Baal-shalom. While the one commemorated the
covenant that had been entered into between the two parts of the
population, the other would have commemorated its ‘peaceful’ settlement.
For the Canaanite it was a covenant, for the Hebrew it was peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account