The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
Some scholars, with more haste than discretion, have pronounced the
Khabiri of the cuneiform tablets to be the Hebrews of the Old Testament.
If that were the case, Hebrew and Israelite could no longer be
considered to be synonymous terms. In the age of the Khabiri the
Israelites of Scripture were still in Egypt, where the cities of Ramses
and Pithom were not as yet built, and their leader to the conquest of
Canaan was Joshua, and not Elimelech. When in subsequent centuries
Ramses II. and Ramses III. invaded and occupied Palestine, they found no
traces there of the children of Israel. They have left us lists of the
places they captured; we look in vain among them for the name of Israel
or of an Israelitish tribe. We look equally in vain in the Book of
Judges for any allusion to Egyptian conquests.
The Khabiri, then, are not the Hebrews of Scripture, nor does the word
throw any light on the term ‘Hebrew’ itself. Khabiri is really a
descriptive title, meaning ‘Confederates’; it was a word borrowed by
Babylonian from the language of Canaan, but is met with in old
Babylonian and Assyrian hymns.[3] It may be that Hebron, the city of
‘the Confederacy,’ derived its name from these ‘Confederated’ bands; at
all events, the name of Hebron is nowhere mentioned by Ebed-Tob or his
brother governors, and it first appears in the Egyptian records in the
time of Ramses III. under the form of Khibur.[4]
The Tel el-Amarna tablets, accordingly, give us no help in regard to the
name of the Hebrews, nor do any other cuneiform inscriptions with which
we are acquainted. Babylonian records do indeed speak of a people called
the Khabirâ, but they inhabited the mountains of Elam, on the eastern
side of Babylonia, and between them and the Hebrews of Scripture no
connection is possible.[5] In an old Babylonian list of foreign
countries we read of a country of Khubur, which was situated in northern
Mesopotamia in the neighbourhood of Harran; but Khubur is more probably
related to the river Khabur than to the kinsfolk of Terah and Laban.[6]
Moreover, a part of the mountains of the Amanus, overlooking the Gulf of
Antioch, from whence logs of pine were brought to the cities of Chaldæa,
was also known as Khabur.[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account