+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+ | | Dankoff. | | Classes of +--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ | Peasants. | Total. | Taille. | Redemption | Rent. | Per | | | | | Tax. | | Cent. | +------------------+--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ |I. Former serfs: | | | | | | | 1. Temporary | | | | | | | obligors | 12.6 | 8.2 | | | 65 | | 2. Proprietors | 11.1 | | 6.6 | | 59 | |II. Former serfs, | | | | | | | subsequently | | | | | | | state | | | | | | | peasants | 7.9 | | | 2.9 | 36 | |III. Former state | | | | | | | peasants | 10.0 | | | 3.8 | 38 | +------------------+--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ +------------------+-----------------------------------------------+ | | Ranenburg. | | Classes of +--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ | Peasants. | Total. | Taille. | Redemption | Rent. | Per | | | | | Tax. | | Cent. | +------------------+--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ |I. Former serfs: | | | | | | | 1. Temporary | | | | | | | obligors | 11.9 | 7.5 | | | 60 | | 2. Proprietors | 10.8 | | 6.3 | | 58 | |II. Former serfs, | | | | | | | subsequently | | | | | | | state | | | | | | | peasants | 7.0 | | | 2.4 | 34 | |III. Former state | | | | | | | peasants | 10.4 | | | 4.4 | 42 | +------------------+--------+---------+------------+-------+-------+ That there is one part of the payments to the landlord which is in reality nothing but a redemption tax for the person of the serf,[45] appears clear from the comparison between the amount of rent paid by the former State peasant to the treasury, and that of the taille paid by the “temporary obligor” to his master, since in neither is any portion set apart for redemption of the land. And the amount of taille paid is made the basis for the amortization.