If there is any one disease that more frequently than any other tempts the physician to have recourse to empirical treatment, it surely is hysteria. The obscurity, in many cases, of its etiology, as well as its frequent obstinacy under the most diverse methods of treatment, successively employed, are alone sufficient to warrant us in having recourse to electricity, where this has not already been employed. Where we can establish the etiology of a given case, we cannot of course be in doubt as to the remedy; and in many instances of this kind we find in electricity our most potent curative agent. But even where we are in doubt or positively ignorant as to the origin of the symptoms, we are justified in giving preference empirically to electricity, not only because, the disease being essentially of a nervous character, we find in electricity the most powerful of neurotics, but also because _recent_ statistics, those that embrace a period when electricity has been permitted to participate, if not duly, at least more largely than heretofore, in the treatment of disease, go to show that by means of this remedy better average results have been obtained than with any other. Again, where there are no positive indications to employ any special method of electrization, either central or local, it appears rational to give the preference to a method that is at the same time central and peripheral, that admits of the application of either current with the utmost facility, and is susceptible of so many modifications that, with at best two or three tentative applications, it can be suitably adapted to almost any given case. The results I have thus far obtained justify me in asserting that, of the cases that are merely functional in their nature, by far the greater majority will yield completely to judicious electro-balneological treatment. As to the mode of administration in this affection, I can suggest nothing. There is so little uniformity in the manifestations of hysteria, that it were idle to even attempt to establish anything like a routine electro-balneological treatment. Each case must make its own laws. CASE VIII.* Mrs. A., aet. 28, married, sterile, from the _clientele_ of Dr. KREMER, was referred to me on June 12th, 1874. She had been a sufferer from hysteria for a number of years. Among the more prominent symptoms were intense _pruritus_, transient flushing and heat of the entire surface, with pricking sensations and headache. Six baths, in each of which both currents were employed, sufficed to effect a complete and permanent cure.