The Elements of Perspective: arranged for the use of schools and intended to be read in connection with the first three books of EuclidRuskin, John
Science
The Elements of Perspective: arranged for the use of schools and intended to be read in connection with the first three books of Euclid
Ruskin, John
Perspective
It is true that in drawing landscapes from nature the sizes and
distances of the objects cannot be accurately known. When, however, we
know how to draw them rightly, if their size were given, we have only to
_assume a rational approximation_ to their size, and the resulting
drawing will be true enough for all intents and purposes. It does not in
the least matter that we represent a distant cottage as eighteen feet
long, when it is in reality only seventeen; but it matters much that we
do not represent it as eighty feet long, as we easily might if we had
not been accustomed to draw from measurement. Therefore, in all the
following problems the measurement of the object is given.
The student must observe, however, that in order to bring the diagrams
into convenient compass, the measurements assumed are generally very
different from any likely to occur in practice. Thus, in Fig. 3., the
distance _DS_ would be probably in practice half a mile or a mile, and
the distance _TS_, from the eye of the observer to the paper, only two
or three feet. The mathematical law is however precisely the same,
whatever the proportions; and I use such proportions as are best
calculated to make the diagram clear.
Now, therefore, the conditions of a perspective problem are the
following:
The Sight-line _GH_ given, Fig. 1.;
The Sight-point _S_ given;
The Station-point _T_ given; and
The three distances of the object,[7] direct, lateral, and vertical,
with its dimensions, given.
The size of the picture, conjecturally limited by the dotted circle, is
to be determined afterwards at our pleasure. On these conditions I
proceed at once to construction.
[3] If the glass were not upright, but sloping, the objects might
still be drawn through it, but their perspective would then be
different. Perspective, as commonly taught, is always calculated
for a vertical plane of picture.
[4] Supposing it to have no thickness; otherwise the images would be
distorted by refraction.
[5] I say “height” instead of “magnitude,” for a reason stated in
Appendix I., to which you will soon be referred. Read on here at
present.
[6] _P_ and _Q_ being points indicative of the place of the tower’s
base and top. In this figure both are above the sight-line; if the
tower were below the spectator both would be below it, and
therefore measured below _D_.
[7] More accurately, “the three distances of any point, either in the
object itself, or indicative of its distance.”
PROBLEM I.
TO FIX THE POSITION OF A GIVEN POINT.[8]
Let _P_, Fig. 4., be the given point.
[Illustration: Fig. 4.]
Let its direct distance be _DT_; its lateral distance to the left, _DC_;
and vertical distance _beneath_ the eye of the observer, _CP_.
[Let _GH_ be the Sight-line, _S_ the Sight-point, and _T_ the
Station-point.][9]
It is required to fix on the plane of the picture the position of the
point P.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account