The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in idealsJoy, John C. (John Chrisentia)
Philosophy
The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in ideals
Joy, John C. (John Chrisentia)
Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome, 121-180
When it got to court, Stoicism put away its primitive roughness. “Plain
living and high thinking” became the accepted creed among the brilliant
society of which Faustina was the centre and the exemplar; just as
now in England ritualism and “the Rome-ward movement” become from
time to time the tone amongst elegant blue-stockings of both sexes.
But of course in Rome, as in London, it would have been bad taste to
take seriously what was, with them, at least, merely an interesting
sentiment. Society now turns out to hear the newest preacher on the
newest theology, or the fashionable and good-looking preacher on any
or no theology. So, too, then; Faustina and the Roman ladies came in
all the glory of flowered silk and rare jewels to the Temple of Peace,
there to hear Rusticus or Fronto, or the Emperor Aurelius himself,
lecturing on the vanity of vanities, the shortness of life, the
blessedness of renunciation. Great families had each its philosopher--a
kind of family chaplain; and the great ladies came in their sedan
chairs to consult their philosophical director on the latest freaks of
their fancy.
This interest in philosophy was partly the cause, partly the effect, of
a general movement towards more humane views. The hard pagan world was
beginning to soften; and this humanity was the greatest glory of the
Golden Age. The Stoics preached the brotherhood of man, and sympathy
with men, as men. Hence charity too became part of the Time-Spirit and
showed itself in milder legislation and in beneficent institutions.
The great ones of the world at last took notice of the weak and the
outcast; the stern rule of might and the pitiless destruction of the
“unfit” at last yielded to altruistic sentiments. The slave, the
orphan, and woman were no longer to be the prey of society.
In his legislation in favour of the oppressed Marcus Aurelius did but
carry on the work begun by Antoninus and his excellent council of
jurists. Their first care was to make easier the lot of the slave.
Seneca had said: “All men, if you only go back to their beginnings,
have the gods for their fathers”; and Epictetus: “The slave like you
is the son of Zeus”; and it was in this spirit of reverence for his
fellow-man as his brother and his equal that Marcus sought to confer
on him, in addition to a theoretical fraternity and equality, the third
of the trinity--freedom. The master was no longer allowed absolute
power of life and death over his slaves; the slave was recognised as
having rights; and enfranchisement was encouraged. As the condition of
the slave, so too that of women and orphans was improved. The inhuman
position of woman under old Roman law, by which she was practically
excluded from recognition as a member of the family, was altered by
laws conferring on her rights of property; while orphans were provided
for by numerous charitable institutions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account