The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in ideals — John Shaqi
The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in idealsJoy, John C. (John Chrisentia)
Philosophy
The Emperor Marcus Aurelius : $b A study in ideals
Joy, John C. (John Chrisentia)
Marcus Aurelius, Emperor of Rome, 121-180
Despite these attempts--feeble they seem and few--at amelioration and
at instilling a higher view of human nature, the amphitheatre still
remained “the great slaughter-house.” When we look at Marcus’ statue
high in the Pantheon of the Positivists, we must remember another
figure, cold and abstracted indeed, but thus all the more convicted
of feebleness, under the awning and the perfume sprays and flowers
of the Roman amphitheatre looking on with impassive tolerance at the
spectacle of human and animal suffering, the daily bread of the most
brutal of all populaces. True, he could soothe his soul by a Stoic
aphorism on the nothingness of pain, or some other such mockery of
human misery--the necessary refuge of those who had no certainty of a
larger hope. For mockery truly must any solution of the problem of evil
be, and vain comfort, which was not written on Calvary. That Marcus
could look on such suffering unmoved; that he could order it for his
fellow-man when the turn of the Christians came; this removes him from
what Christians look for in their leaders to the land of Promise. It
mattered little that he did not take the delight and interest which
Faustina, seated by strange irony among the Vestal Virgins, robed in
all the magnificence which the Via Nova could produce, took in her
favourite gladiators; or which Commodus, the centre of the fastest
group of young Roman nobles, manifested at every thrust, eager for the
day when he himself could enter the arena as Emperor and fight with the
beasts. The mere fact that he could countenance such brutality condemns
him to the level of conventional mediocrity.
As Pater says: “Those cruel amusements were, certainly, the sin of
blindness, of deadness and stupidity.... Yes! what was needed was the
heart that would make it impossible to witness all this; and the future
would be with the forces that could beget a heart like that.... Surely
evil was a real thing, and the wise man wanting in the sense of it,
where not to have been, by instinctive election, on the right side was
to have failed in life.”
The humanity of the age, though unable to effect any appreciable
reform of the amphitheatre, did much for the relief of the sick. The
great plague brought back from the East by Lucius Verus and his troops
was ravaging the Empire. It has been compared to the great plague of
Athens, which will live for ever in Thucydides’ vivid phrases, and
to the Black Death of the 14th century. Niebuhr says that it was a
disaster from which the old world never recovered. Asia Minor, Greece,
Italy, and Gaul were darkened by its passing; and in Rome itself, so
Dio, a Roman senator, tells us, two thousand men were buried every
day. A Golden Age! An age of peace and happiness indeed! Rather an age
whose glory is that it was an age of hospitals, of funeral clubs and
orphanages; of relief of suffering rather than freedom therefrom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account