The Energy System of Matter: A Deduction from Terrestrial Energy Phenomena — John Shaqi
The Energy System of Matter: A Deduction from Terrestrial Energy PhenomenaWeir, James, active 1883-1912
Science
The Energy System of Matter: A Deduction from Terrestrial Energy Phenomena
Weir, James, active 1883-1912
Force and energy
There are several points to be noted with regard to these phenomena of
inception. In the first place, it is clear that the energy which thus
constitutes the magnetic field plays no active part in the main process
of transformation: during the operation it neither varies in value nor
in nature: it is entirely a passive agent. Neither is any continuous
expenditure of energy required for the maintenance of this incepting
influence. It is true that the magnetic field is primarily due to a
circulatory current in the coils or winding of the electro-magnet, but
after the initial expenditure of energy in establishing that field is
incurred, the continuous expenditure of energy during the flow of the
current is devoted to simply heating the coils. A continuous heat
transformation is thus in progress. The magnetic energy influence,
although closely associated with this heat transformation, yet
represents in itself a distinct and separate energy feature. This last
point is, perhaps, made more clear if it be assumed that, without
altering the system in any way, the electro-magnet is replaced by a
permanent magnet of precisely the same dimensions and magnetic power.
There would then be no energy expenditure whatever for excitation, but
nevertheless, the main transformation would take place in precisely the
same manner and to exactly the same degree as before. The incepting
energy influence is found in the residual magnetism.
If an iron ball or sphere were substituted, in the experiment, for the
copper one, the phenomena observed on its rotation would be of an
exactly similar nature to those described above. There is, however, one
point of difference. Since the iron is magnetic, the magnet pole will
now exert an attractive force on the iron mass, and if the latter were
in close proximity to the pole (Fig. 1), a considerable expenditure of
energy might be required to separate the two. It is evident, then, that
in the case of iron and the magnetic metals, this magnetic influence is
such that an expenditure of energy is required, not only to cause these
materials to move in rotation so as to cut the lines of the field of the
magnetic influence, but also to cause them to move outwards from the
seat of the influence _along_ the lines of the field. The movements,
indeed, involve transformations of energy totally different in nature.
Assuming the energy to be obtained, in both cases, from the same
external source, it is, in the first instance, converted by rotatory
motion in the field into electrical and heat energy, whereas, in the
second case, by the outward motion of displacement from the pole, it is
transformed and associated with the mass in the form of energy of
position or energy of displacement relative to the pole. Since the
attractive force between the iron mass and the pole may be assumed to
diminish according to a well-known law, the energy transformation per
unit displacement will also diminish at the same rate. The precise
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account