The section gives an adequate idea of the internal treatment; it
shows the great hall and its lighting, as well as the very simple
decoration of the rooms, far plainer in this case than in most of
those published in his book. The rooms are usually panelled somewhat
after the manner shown in Figs. 166 and 167. This gives an air of
distinction to them, but it severely limits (and perhaps not unhappily)
the number of pictures and prints which can be hung on the walls. A
very similar treatment is applied to the staircases (Fig. 168). In one
instance the walls were apparently to be painted with an architectural
composition, which introduces a touch of poetry into the practical
prose of Gibbs’s ordinary handling (Fig. 169). There is a house in
Dean Street, Soho (Fig. 171), where the staircase walls are decorated
with figure subjects by Hogarth, somewhat after the fashion of Gibbs’s
drawing, but more elaborate in design. The decoration of the rooms
already illustrated includes in each case the chimney-piece, but a
further example, to a larger scale (Fig. 170), will serve to show the
kind of design which was widely adopted, not only by Gibbs but by most
architects during the first half of the eighteenth century.
Campbell was also a practising architect as well as an illustrator of
the art, and he was consulted in the erection of Houghton Hall, in
Norfolk, which is one of the finest examples of the great houses of its
period, a period when nobles and wealthy gentlemen were vying with one
another in building fine homes in the fashionable Italian manner, and
surrounding them with equally fine gardens. It was the celebrated Prime
Minister, Sir Robert Walpole, who built Houghton; and Colin Campbell
supplied him with the design in the year 1722.[71] It would appear,
however, that Campbell did not carry out the work himself, but that his
designs were handed over to Ripley, who altered them in many respects
while following the general idea pretty faithfully. The sizes and
disposition of the rooms were varied, both in the central block and in
the wings. The proportions of the windows were altered, and Campbell’s
projecting portico was omitted, the columns being attached to the wall
instead of standing some fifteen feet in front of it. The attic stories
of his corner pavilions were also changed into domes. On the whole
these slight alterations tended to improve the appearance, but in spite
of these variations, Campbell must have the credit for the design (Fig.
173).
[Illustration: FIG. 172.--Houghton, Norfolk. Plan of Principal
Floor, 1722.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account