Smithson’s house-plans are of great interest, inasmuch as they belong
to the order of things which was shortly to pass away. Some of them
follow the traditional lines which made the hall the principal
apartment of the house, placing it between the family rooms and the
servants’ quarters. The plan “for My Lord Sheffield’s house” is an
example of this arrangement (Fig. 14). It shows the rooms grouped in
the old way round a courtyard, which had to be traversed in approaching
the hall from the front door. The hall itself was entered through the
screens at its lower end, and was flanked at its upper end by the
parlour and other family rooms, and by the grand staircase. On the
opposite side of the court were the kitchen, pantry, and other rooms
for the service of the house. In the four corners of the court were
square turrets containing subsidiary staircases. On the upper floor
(Fig. 14) the chief rooms were the dining-chamber, placed as far from
the kitchen as the limits of the house would allow, and the long
gallery. The fact of a special room being set apart for dining itself
indicates a fairly late date in respect of this ancient type of plan.
As my Lord Sheffield was created Earl of Mulgrave in 1626, the plan
must be prior to that year, but the house was probably not more than
ten years old when the change of title took place.
[Illustration: FIG. 16.--Bolsover Castle, Derbyshire. The
Riding-House.]
The other specimen of Smithson’s planning is one of the H type,
with the hall in one of the wings (Fig. 15). This is a departure
from the old arrangement, which would have placed the hall in the
central block, and thus have brought the buttery (which opens from
the screens) into close touch with the kitchens. The hall becomes
here more of a passage-room and less of a living-room than under
the ancient disposition. There are no sitting-rooms for the family
on the ground floor, but the principal staircase leads to the great
chamber on the upper floor, thence to the long gallery and a distant
“withdrawing-chamber,” as well as to the chapel and several bedrooms.
[Illustration: FIG. 17.--Elevation of a House, not named.
From the Smithson Collection.]
Both these houses are rigidly symmetrical in their external treatment,
and it is interesting to note how, in addition to preserving such
old-established rooms as the great chamber and long gallery, they
depend for their external effect upon old features, such as mullioned
windows, arcaded entrances, turrets, and the breaking up of the various
fronts with substantial projections and large bay-windows. These
devices were customary among the designers of the time of Elizabeth and
James I., but they were gradually to be superseded by other methods.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account