The only person of the plural number originally ending in dh is the second;
as _s['o]keith_, _prennat_, _kallith_, _lufiadh_; the original ending of
the first person being _-mes_, or _-m_, as _prennames_, _s[^o]kjam_,
_koellum_. Now, in Anglo-Saxon, the _first_ person ends in dh, as
_lufiadh_. Has _-m_, or _-mes_, changed to dh, or has the second person
superseded the first? The latter alternative seems the likelier.
s. 351. The detail of the persons seems to be as follows:--
_I call_, first person singular.--The word _call_ is not one person more
than another. It is the simple verb, wholly uninflected. It is very
probable that the first person was the {298} one where the characteristic
termination was first lost. In the Modern Norse language it is replaced by
the second: _Jeg taler_=_I speak_, Danish.
_Thou callest_, second person singular.--The final _-t_ appears throughout
the Anglo-Saxon, although wanting in Old Saxon. In Old High German it
begins to appear in Otfrid, and is general in Notker. In Middle High German
and New High German it is universal.--Deutsche Grammatik, i. 1041. 857.
_He calleth_, or _he calls_, third person singular.--The _-s_ in _calls_ is
the _-th_ in _calleth_, changed. The Norse form _kallar_ either derives its
_-r_ from the _-th_ by way of change, or else the form is that of the
second person replacing the first.
_Lufiadh_, Anglo-Saxon, first person plural.--The second person in the
place of the first. The same in Old Saxon.
_Lufiadh_, Anglo-Saxon, third person plural.--Possibly changed from -ND, as
in _s[^o]kjand_. More probably the second person.
_Loven_, Old English.--For all the persons of the plural. This form may be
accounted for in three ways: 1. The _-m_ of the Moeso-Gothic and High Old
German became _-n_; as it is in the Middle and Modern German, where all
traces of the original _-m_ are lost. In this case the first person has
replaced the other two. 2. The _-nd_ may have become _-n_; in which case it
is the third person that replaces the others. 3. The indicative form
_loven_ may have arisen out of a subjunctive one; since there was in
Anglo-Saxon the form _lufion_, or _lufian_, subjunctive. In the Modern
Norse languages the third person replaces the other two: _Vi tale_, _I
tale_, _de tale_=_we talk_, _ye talk_, _they talk_.
s. 352. _The person in_ -T.--_Art_, _wast_, _wert_, _shalt_, _wilt_. Here
the second person singular ends, not in _-st_, but in _-t_. A reason for
this (though not wholly satisfactory) we find in the Moeso-Gothic and the
Icelandic.
In those languages the form of the person changes with the tense, and the
second singular of the praeterite tense of one conjugation is, not _-s_,
but _-t_; as Moeso-Gothic, _sv[^o]r_=_I swore_, _sv[^o]rt_=_thou swarest_,
_gr['a]ip_=_I griped_, _gr['a]ipt_=_thou gripedst_; Icelandic,
_brannt_=_thou burnest_, _gaft_=_thou_ {299} _gavest_. In the same
languages ten verbs are conjugated like praeterites. Of these, in each
language, _skal_ is one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account