The English of military communicationsGanoe, William Addleman
History
The English of military communications
Ganoe, William Addleman
English language -- Rhetoric; Military orders; United States. Army -- Records and correspondence
On the march, as you overtake, or are joined by, the field trains
of the troops, you will assume command.
Hasten your march until you are clear of JEPSOM.
SMITH,
_Chief of Staff_.
Copies to all Commanders.
By Lieut. Jones to officer in charge of trains.
Birmingham,
8 Sept. ’25, 9-50 a. m.
To Captain Mott, commanding trains:
Our advance guard met at 9-30 a. m. two battalions hostile infantry
at GARLINGTON.
Have trains keep well closed and follow main body without distance.
NORTON,
_Colonel, commanding_.
The first two examples are of the formal type. The third one is less
so.
_Verbal orders_ are usually transmitted by officers. However, if the
order consists of a single sentence such as, “The trains will halt
two hours at Bingham,” it may be transmitted by an enlisted man.
Although there is more latitude in the form of written _order_
than in that of the field order, the one should be as brief and
unmistakable in its construction as the other. The paragraph
structure and sequence should be as logical and unified as English
composition can make them.
With your book open at the extract from Field Service Regulations in
regard to _the order_, compose enough imaginary _orders_ to cover all
the instances therein given.
LETTERS OF INSTRUCTION
_Letters of Instruction_ chiefly differ from orders, operation
orders, and field orders in their lack of definition of specific
tactical duties. They are truly instructions. They deal mainly with
strategic considerations and general plans, because the writer is
usually far away from, or not in direct command of, the units which
are going to carry out the general plans.
At the beginning of campaigns _letters of instruction_ enumerate the
troops of the various commands and the corresponding leaders.
“In armies, combat orders will often be in the form of, or a part
of, letters of instruction to the commanding generals in the field
armies composing the army. But where the field armies are within
supporting distance of each other and can mutually coöperate in the
task assigned them, formal combat orders may be issued. Such orders
are necessarily general in character and consist of a statement
of the objective sought by the army commander, and of the part he
expects each field army to play in attaining this objective. The army
commander, either by means of letters of instruction or by personal
conferences with his field army commanders, fully acquaints them not
only with the immediate end in view, but also with so much of his
future plans as may be necessary to insure thorough cooperation on
their part.”[17]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account