The English Prison SystemRuggles-Brise, Evelyn, Sir
History
The English Prison System
Ruggles-Brise, Evelyn, Sir
Prisons -- Great Britain
What has since been known as the Progressive Stage System was
introduced by regulations passed subsequently to the Act of 1857.
They prescribed a period of nine months in separate confinement, the
remaining term of the sentence being divided into three stages of
discipline, representing three equal portions of the residue of the
sentence. On passing from the first to the second Stage, prisoners were
rewarded in the way of extra gratuities, badges, etc. On arriving at
the third Stage, there was a further increase of privileges of the same
nature, and a different dress from that of ordinary convicts was worn.
The object aimed at was to devise a useful system of progressive
reformatory discipline, based upon a nice adjustment of the elements of
hope and repression, but subject to the principle that the punishment
due to the crime is the primary object, and that, consistently with
that, no effort to reform should be neglected.
This idea of progressive reformatory discipline had, therefore, an
entirely English origin, and was the result of the tireless efforts
made at that time by Sir Joshua Jebb, and his colleagues, to devise a
system for the punishment of serious crime in lieu of Transportation.
It retained such features of the Colonial System as it was practicable
to engraft on the system of Penal Servitude at home, although this
latter involved a longer term of detention in actual custody with
diminished prospect of employment on discharge.
It betrays a curious ignorance of the English System that the origin
of this idea has become historically attributed to an Irish source.
Idle principle which had been established with so much care at
Pentonville and Portland was introduced into Ireland by Sir Joshua
Jebb himself, when, in consequence of the number of convicts in that
country rising from 700 to two or three thousand, he was ordered by
the Government to proceed to Dublin, and advise the Prison Authority
there with a view to the adoption of the Progressive System. The
English Rules were, as far as possible, applied at Spike Island and
at Mountjoy. In 1850, a few years later, Sir Joshua Jebb was again
ordered by the Government to proceed to Ireland, but as he was unable
to go, Captain Knight, Governor of Portsmouth Prison, took his place,
with the result that a Board of three Directors was formed, (of which
Captain Knight was a member) who entered upon their duties in 1854.
Captain Crofton, Chairman of the Board, stated in evidence before
a Committee of the House of Commons that he had followed out the
English System, and in the Report for 1855 it is stated that the
System of Progressive Classification continued to have an excellent
effect. The only difference in the Irish System was the adoption of an
Intermediate Stage before discharge followed by Police Supervision,
both the conditions having been established as elements of the
English System in the Colonies. This part of the Colonial System was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account