The English Secretary; or, Methode of Writing Epistles and Letters (1599): With, a Declaration of Such Tropes, Figures, and Schemes, as Either Usually or for Ornament Sake Are Therein RequiredDay, Angel, active 1575-1595
General
The English Secretary; or, Methode of Writing Epistles and Letters (1599): With, a Declaration of Such Tropes, Figures, and Schemes, as Either Usually or for Ornament Sake Are Therein Required
Day, Angel, active 1575-1595
English language -- Rhetoric -- Early works to 1800; Letter writing -- Early works to 1800; Rhetoric -- Early works to 1800
about to procure it, so that it maie be well saide, |hee did exasperate
his furies the more, by inducing such a speach, or such an acte:| but
it cannot bee so properlie deliuered to saie, |exasperate not your
selfe for such a thing|, especiallie when I am not therewith so much as
in anie mislike alreadie, which no man canne at anie time bee, without
he first knowe an occasion: your |Vrbanitie| likewise being deriued
of the Latine worde |Vrbanus|, which is ciuile, courteous, gentle,
modest, or well ruled, as men commonlie are in Cities and places of
good gouernement, whereof that worde taketh his originall, the worde
is not common amongst vs, nor so apt to the sense as if hee had saide,
|your curtesie, your modestie|, and so it might run thus, |Let not your
curtesies be agreeued against me|, or, |Let it not be offensiue to your
modesty, that for the benefite of a great manie, I haue published this
volume of Physicke|. The grounde was verie good, for his intendment
was, that the cause belonged to a common wealth, wherein if anie
particular commoditie seemed to be lessened, wise men and such as were
more studious of their Countries good, then of their owne peculiar
gaine, ought not to be offended. Then saith he: |And this not only, but
also I doe it for no detriment, &c.| What confused deliuerance is this?
How much more orderlie thus, which soundeth also more to his meaning.
|And this also respected, in that I doe it not for anie detriment vnto
you, but for a preferment of your laudable science|. Then his comming
in with |arcane science, inartious fooles and insipient persons|, had
it not beene lesse improper, if hee had saide |profounde science,
and vnskilfull or vnlearned|, for |inartious|, and to haue contented
himselfe with his |fooles|, without adding to the same |insipient
persons|. Lastlie he proceedeth: |And many the which dooth thinke
themselues wise (the which in this facultie are fooles indeede) will
enterprise, &c.| Here is |the which| and |the which|, a phrase neuer
with vs accustomed, nor with anie good writer in his time (which was
not manie yeares since) the sence whereof might in this sort more
plainelie bee deliuered. |And many who in their owne opinion doe seeme
verie wise (but therein are in truth verie fooles) will enterprise,
&c.| But of this ynough, for that I thinke it nowe high time to proceed
to the rest, these two exemples being sufficient to admonish the
learner, of the congruitie of his speaches and sentences, with good
phrases that bee most agreeing to the meaning, and not improperlie, to
be deliuered, whereby he shall auoid the like errour, and absurditie
in conueiance hereby expressed, and already so much reprehended.=
Of the habite and parts of an Epistle. _Cap. 3._
[Sidenote: Character of an Epistle generall.]
[Sidenote: Epistles distinguished into generall and speciall.]
[Sidenote: Letters general are familar.]
[Sidenote: Letters special.]
[Sidenote: Difference of stile.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account