The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)Seebohm, Frederic
History
The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)
Seebohm, Frederic
Village communities -- Great Britain
Brian M'Art Oge M'Mahowne, in demesne, 1 tate 16.
«The tribesmen blood relations.»
Now, by comparison it will be seen that at both dates there were
sixteen _tates_ in the bailebiatagh, and that the holders were
evidently blood relations. In some cases the name of a son takes the
place of his father (the genealogy being kept up), and in others new
tenants appear.
«The _tates_ family holdings.»
There is also reason to suppose that these _tates_ were family
homesteads (like the _tyddyns_ of the Welsh 'family land'), with
smaller internal divisions, and embracing a considerable number
of lesser households. The fact that one person only is named as
holding the tate, or the two tates, as the case may be, suggests
that he is so named as the common ancestor or head of the chief
household representing all the belongings to the tate. _Within_
the tate the subdivision of land seems to have been carried to an
indefinite extent. The following extract from Sir John Davies' report
will probably give the best account of the actual and, to his eye,
somewhat confused condition of things within the tates, as he found
them. It relates to the county of Fermanagh, and is in the form of a
letter to the Earl of Salisbury, dated 1607:[279]-- [p218]
«Sir John Davies' description of the septs.»
For the several possessions of all these lands we took this
course to find them out, and set them down for his lordship's
information. We called unto us the inhabitants of every barony
severally. . . We had present certain of the clerks or scholars
of the country, who know all the _septs_ and _families_, and
all their branches, and _the dignity[280] of one sept above
another_, and what families or persons _were chief of every
sept_, and who were _next_, and who were of _a third rank_,
and so forth, till they descended to the most inferior man in
all the baronies; moreover, they took upon them to tell what
quantity of land every man ought to have by the custom of their
country, which is of the nature of gavelkind. Whereby, as their
septs or families did multiply, their possessions have been
from time to time divided and subdivided and broken into so
many small parcels as almost every acre of land hath a several
owner, which termeth himself a lord, and his portion of land
his country: notwithstanding, as McGuyre himself had a chiefry
over all the country, and some demesnes that did ever pass to
him only who carried that title; so was there a chief of every
sept who had certain services, duties, or demesnes, that ever
passed to the tannist of that sept, and never was subject to
division. When this was understood, we first inquired whether
one or more septs did possess that barony which we had in hand.
That being set down, we took the names of the chief parties
of the sept or septs that did possess the baronies, and also
the names of such as were second in them, and so of others
that were inferior unto them again in rank and in possessions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account