The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)Seebohm, Frederic
History
The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)
Seebohm, Frederic
Village communities -- Great Britain
It is remarkable that, to the present day, in those districts of
Bavaria where the Code Napoléon has not superseded ancient custom
and law, the 'Pflicht-theil' of not less than one-half or one-third,
as fixed by the later Roman law, still remains inalienable from
the heirs, whilst a custom for the father to hand over the whole
or a part of the family holding to a son during his lifetime also
occurs.[466]
These coincidences between customs of Syria and Bavaria--both once
Roman provinces--refer to land of inheritance. But there were also
in Syria as elsewhere in the fifth century, between the freeholders
and the slaves, a class of semi-servile tenants--_adscriptitii_--who
were, in a sense, the property of a lord.[467] And besides these,
again, from the time of the New Testament[468] to the present, there
have been tenants paying a tithe or other portion of the produce in
return for a usufruct only of public or private lands.
There is no direct reference to public tithe lands in the Syrian
code, but the following description of present customs as regards
such lands may be valuable in the absence of earlier evidence. It
describes the tenants of the Crown tithe lands in Palestine as having
only a usufruct, expiring at their death, and as conducting their
husbandry upon an open-field system, which being so widely spread is
no doubt very ancient, and likely enough to resemble [p314] more or
less closely local methods followed on the 'Agri Decumates' under
Roman rule.[469]
«Land system in Palestine.»
Land tenure in Palestine is of three kinds:--
I. _Ard miri_,[470] or taxed Crown land.
In this class are included nearly all the large and fruitful
plains like those of Jaffa, Ramleh, and Esdraelon. These
lands are leased by the Government to various individuals, or
_sometimes to a whole village_. The lessee pays a _tenth_ of
the produce of the soil for his right of cultivation. _Miri_
land, therefore, cannot be sold by the lessee, nor has he
the power to transfer it; he merely possesses the right of
cultivation for a given time, and this only holds good during
the lifetime of the lessee. In the event of his death, the
contract he has made becomes null and void, even though its
term be not expired.
II. _Ard wakûf_, or glebe-land. . . .
III. _Ard mulk,_ or freehold, is chiefly composed of small
pieces of ground in the neighbourhood of the villages, such as
fig and olive plantations, gardens, and vineyards. . . .
«Tithe lands let to villages, and worked under the
open-field system.»
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account