The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)Seebohm, Frederic
History
The English Village Community: Examined in its Relations to the Manorial and Tribal Systems and to the Common or Open Field System of Husbandry; An Essay in Economic History (Reprinted from the Fourth Edition)
Seebohm, Frederic
Village communities -- Great Britain
It has been already mentioned that by far the greater part of
the cultivated land is not private, but Government property,
either _miri_ or _wakûf_, and that the cultivator is merely
the holder. Each district has certain tracts of such lands,
and after the rains they are let to the different inhabitants
in separate plots. The division is decided by lottery. Herr
Schick has given an account of the manner in which this lottery
takes place. All those who are desirous of land assemble in
the _sāha_ (an open place generally in front of the inns).
The Imam, or _khatib_, who is writer, accountant, and general
archivist to the whole village, presides over this meeting.
The would-be cultivators notify how many ploughs they can
muster. If a man has only a half-share in one, he joins another
man with a like share. Then the whole number is divided into
classes. Supposing the total number of ploughs to be forty,
these would be divided into four classes of ten, and each class
would choose a Sheikh to represent them. The land of course
varies in quality, and this division into classes makes the
distribution simpler. Say there are four classes, the land is
divided into four equal portions, so that each class may have
good as well as bad. When the Sheikhs have agreed that the
division is fair, the lots are drawn. Each of the Sheikhs puts
some little thing into the _khatib's_ bag. Then the _khatib_
calls out the name of one of the divisions, and some passing
child is [p315] made to draw out one of the things from the
bag, and to whichever Sheikh it belongs, to this class belongs
the division named by the _khatib_. This decided, the Sheikhs
have to determine the individual distribution of the land. In
the case of ten ploughs to a class, _they do not each receive a
tenth piece of the whole, but, in order to make it as fair as
possible, the land is divided into strips, so that each portion
consists of a collection of strips in different parts of the
village lands_. The boundaries are marked by _furrows_ or
stones, and to move a neighbour's landmark is still accounted
an 'accursed deed,' as in the days of ancient Israel (Deut.
xix. 4). . . .
_The measure by which the Fellahin divide their land is the
feddân. It is decided by the amount which a man with a yoke
of oxen can plough per day, and is therefore a most uncertain
measure._
«Was it so on the Roman tithe lands?»
This description of the mode in which public land in Palestine is
often let to individual tenants or to whole villages at a rent of
a tenth of the produce, and further, the picture it gives of the
cultivation of the land let to a village by those villagers who
supply oxen for the ploughing on an open-field system so like that of
Western Europe, at least may suggest the possibility of a somewhat
similar system having been adopted in the management of the tithe
lands of the 'Agri Decumates.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account