The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
_P._ No. I am satisfied that the kings that grant such liberties, are
bound to make them good, so far as it may be done without sin: but if a
King find that by such a grant he be disabled to protect his subjects,
if he maintain his grant, he sins; and therefore may, and ought to take
no notice of the said grant. For such grants, as by error or false
suggestion are gotten from him, are, as the lawyers do confess, void and
of no effect, and ought to be recalled. Also the King, as is on all
hands confessed, hath the charge lying upon him to protect his people
against foreign enemies, and to keep the peace betwixt them within the
kingdom: if he do not his utmost endeavour to discharge himself thereof,
he committeth a sin, which neither King nor Parliament can lawfully
commit.
_L._ No man, I think, will deny this. For if levying of money be
necessary, it is a sin in the Parliament to refuse; if unnecessary, it
is a sin both in King and Parliament to levy. But for all that, it may
be, and I think it is, a sin in any one that hath the sovereign power,
be he one man or one assembly, being intrusted with the safety of a
whole nation, if rashly, and relying upon his own natural sufficiency,
he make war or peace, without consulting with such, as by their
experience and employment abroad, and intelligence by letters, or other
means, have gotten the knowledge in some measure of the strength,
advantages, and designs of the enemy, and the manner and the degree of
the danger that may from thence arise. In like manner, in case of
rebellion at home, if he consult not with those of military condition;
which if he do, then I think he may lawfully proceed to subdue all such
enemies and rebels; and that the soldiers ought to go on without
inquiring whether they be within the country, or without. For who shall
suppress rebellion, but he that hath right to levy, command, and dispose
of the militia? The last Long Parliament denied this. But why? Because
by the major part of their votes the rebellion was raised with the
design to put down monarchy, and to that end maintained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account