The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Hobbes, Thomas
Philosophy, English -- 17th century
The _proem_ is the beginning of an oration, and, as it were, the
preparing of the way before one enter into it.
In some kinds of orations it resembles the _prelude_ of _musicians_, who
first play what they list, and afterwards the tune they intended. In
other kinds it resembles the _prologue_ of a _play_, that contains the
argument.
Proems of the first sort, are most proper for _demonstrative_ orations;
in which a man is free to foretell, or not, what points he will insist
upon. And for the most part it is better not; because when a man has not
obliged himself to a certain matter, _digression_ will seem _variety_;
but if he have engaged himself, _variety_ will be accounted
_digression_.
In _demonstratives_, the matter of the _proem_ consisteth in the
_praise_ or _dispraise_ of some _law_ or _custom_, or in _exhortation_
or _dehortation_, or in something that serves to incline the hearer to
the purpose.
Proems of the second kind are most proper for _judicial_ orations. For
as the _prologue_ in a _dramatic_, and the _exordium_ in an _epic_ poem,
setteth forth in few words the argument of the poem; so in a _judicial
oration_, the orator ought to exhibit a model of his oration, that the
mind of the hearer may not be suspended, and for want of foresight err
or wander.
Whatsoever else belongs to a _proem_, is drawn from one of these four:
from the _speaker_, from the _adversary_, from the _hearer_, or from the
_matter_.
From the _speaker_ and _adversary_, are drawn into proems such
criminations and purgations as belong not to the cause.
To the _defendant_, it is necessary in the proem to answer to the
accusations of his _adversary_; that those being cleared, he may have a
more favourable entrance to the rest of his oration.
But to the _plaintiff_, it is better to cast his criminations all into
the _epilogue_; that the judge may the more easily remember them.
From the _hearer_ and from the _matter_, are drawn into the proem such
things as serve to make the _hearer_ favourable or angry, attentive or
not attentive, as need shall require.
And _hearers_ use to be attentive to _persons_ that are reputed _good_;
to _things_ that are of _great consequence_, or that _concern
themselves_, or that are _strange_, or that _delight_.
But to make the _hearer_ attentive, is not the part of the _proem_ only,
but of any other part of the oration, and rather of any other part than
of the proem. For the _hearer_ is everywhere more remiss than in the
beginning. And therefore wheresoever there is need, the orator must make
appear both the _probity_ of his own _person_, and that the _matter_ in
hand is of _great consequence_; or that it concerns the _hearer_, or
that it is _new_, or that it is _delightful_.
He that will have the hearer attentive to _him_, but not to the _cause_,
must on the other side make it seem that the _matter_ is a _trifle_
without relation to the _hearer_, _common_ and _tedious_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account