The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthodeChristine, de Pisan
Philosophy
The epistle of Othea to Hector; or, The boke of knyghthode
Christine, de Pisan
Fastolf, John, 1378?-1459; French poetry -- To 1500 -- Translations into English
In the bataile Hector was founde discouerede of his harneis, and thanne
he was sleyne. And therefor it is seide to the goode knyght that he
shuld not in bataile be discouered of his harneis. For Hermes seyth that
deth farith as the stokke[548] of an arrowe and lyff farith as an arrowe
that is sette to shoote.[549]
There where it is seide that he shuld kepe hym couered with his harneis
it is vndirstond that the good sperite shulde kepe his wittis cloose and
not voide. Seynt Grigori seith hereoff that a person the which departhit
hys vittis fareth as a iowgolowre the [Sidenote: f. 69.] which fyndeth
no wers hous than his owyn; therefor he is euer owte of his hows, euen
as a man that kepith not his wittes clos is euer vagaunt and owte of the
hous of his conscience and farith as an opyn hall where men may entre on
euery syde. Therefor [our] Lorde seith in the Gospell, [“Clauso ostio,
ora Patrem tuum in abscondito.”][550]
XCII.
Of Pollibetes[551] coveite not hastly
His harmes, for thei be vnhappy;
Of his dispoylyng folowed, parde,
Thi wofull deth be theyme þat sewed þe.
Polibetes was a full myghty kyng, the which Hector slewe in the bataile
after many othir grete dedes that he hadde done that day. And becawse
that he was harmede with ffayre harmes and reche, Hector coveite theyme
and stowpyd doung of his hors nekke for to dispoyle the body, and than
Achilles, the which swede after hym with hole will to take hym
discouerte, smote hym beneth for fawte off his harmure and at oo stroke
kylled hym, of whom it was grete harme, ffor a worthier knyght was neuer
gyrte whyth swerde of the which stories maken mencion. And that sich
couetyses may be no noyens[552] in sich places it shewith bi the seide
cas. Therefor the philosophir seith, “Disoordnet couetise[553] ledith a
man to deth.”
That we shulde not couete Polibetis armis, we may vndirstond that the
goode speryte shuld haue no couetise to no maner of wordly thynges. For
Innocent seith[554] that it ledith a man to deth, for covetise it is a
fyre that may not be stawnched. The couetous person is neuer content to
haue that the which he desyrith, for, whan he hath that he desiryd, he
desyrith euer more, euer he setteth his ende in as mych as that he
tenteth to have more and not to that the which he hath. Averyse and
covetise be .ii^o. saus makers,[555] the which sesseth neuer to seye,
“Bryng, bryng”; and to the value that the money waxeth the loue of the
mony waxeth. Couetise is the way to the gostly deth and oftetymes to
bodily deth. Therefor the postyll Seynt Powle seith, [“Radix omnium
malorum cupiditas est”].[556]
XCIII.
Assote the not in love of strawnge kynde;
The deede of Achilles haue in mynde,
Which wende to make of hys enmye [Sidenote: f. 70.]
His veri lyffe and that interely.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account