The Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude Preached and Explained — John Shaqi
The Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude Preached and ExplainedLuther, Martin
ReligionChristian
The Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude Preached and Explained
Luther, Martin
Bible. Jude; Bible. Jude -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Bible. Peter; Bible. Peter -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
So, also, one Apostle has written the same [Gospel] that is contained
in another's writings; but they who insist most largely and
emphatically on this, that faith on Christ alone justifies, are the
best Evangelists. Therefore St. Paul's Epistles are more a Gospel
than Matthew, Mark and Luke, for the latter give little more than the
history of the works and miracles of Christ; but of the grace which
we have through Christ, none write so emphatically as St. Paul,
especially in his Epistle to the Romans. And yet, since more
importance by far belongs to the word than to the works and deeds of
Christ, and where we are to be deprived of one it were better that we
should want the works and the history than the word and the doctrine;
those books are to be most highly esteemed which most largely treat
of the doctrine and words of the Lord Christ; for though the miracles
of Christ had never been, and we had no knowledge of them, we should
yet have had enough in the _word_, without which we could not have
had life.
Thus this Epistle of St. Peter is one of the noblest books in the New
Testament, and contains indeed the pure Gospel; for he takes the same
course as St. Paul and all the Evangelists, in inculcating the true
doctrine of faith,--as that Christ has been given us, who takes away
our sin and saves us, as we shall hear.
Hence you may judge of all books and doctrines, what is Gospel or
not; for what is not set forth or written of in this manner, you may
safely decide to be false, however excellent in appearance. This
power to decide is one that all Christians possess,--not the Pope or
Councils, who boast that they only have the power to determine.--This
is sufficient introduction and preface. Let us now listen to the
Epistle.
THE FIRST EPISTLE GENERAL OF ST. PETER.
CHAPTER I.
V. 1, 2. _Peter an Apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers
scattered abroad in Pontus, Galatia, Capadocia, Asia and Bithynia,
elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through
sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the
blood of Jesus Christ._
That is the superscription and subscription. Here you quickly
perceive that it is the Gospel. He calls himself an Apostle--that is,
one sent to declare a message; therefore it is correctly rendered in
Dutch, a messenger, or a twelfth-messenger,[1] because they were
twelve. But since it is generally understood what Apostle (the Greek
word) means, I have not rendered it in Dutch. But its peculiar
meaning is, one who bears a message by word of mouth; not one who
carries letters, but a capable man who presents a matter orally, and
advocates it,--of the class that in the Latin are called _Oratores_.
So he would now say, I am an Apostle of Jesus Christ,--that is, I
have a command from Jesus Christ that I, from Christ, am to proclaim.
[Footnote 1: _Tswolffbott_ in the original, for which we have no
equivalent English word.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account