Erotic literature -- History and criticism; Psychoanalysis and literature; Sex in literature
Freud has shown us that psychoneuroses, like hysteria and obsessions,
have their origin in an infantile overattachment to the parent of the
opposite sex, which remains unconscious but nevertheless is an active
and disturbing element. It is perfectly natural that this condition
should exist in infancy, but it disappears in the normal person. If
it does not, one's entire life will be influenced by his inability
to overcome the too intense love for mother or infantile hatred for
the father. If a man has had an unfortunate repression in childhood
such as the early death of a mother he loved intensely, his destiny
in life will be affected. This fact has been understood by people
from time immemorial. If an abnormal situation develops like a hatred
in childhood for the mother, the child's life will be in the future
shaped differently from that of most people. People especially are
influenced in the way they react to the world and to love affairs by
the frustration or repression of their earliest love. If they become
writers their literary work is charged with a certain tone, depending
on the nature of the author's relation with his parents.
By this discovery of Freud's literary criticism receives a new impetus.
Most literary biographers unconsciously worked in accordance with this
theory, for they always stated, where possible, the relations of the
writer to his parents. Freud merely formulated and proved the truth of
the theory.
Why were Schopenhauer and Byron such pessimists? Among the many causes
that later in life contributed to impart the note of woe and despair
to their work, was the fact that both men were in unusually unhappy
relations with their mothers and their quarrels with them are matters
of literary history. Why are men like Lafcadio Hearn and Edgar Allan
Poe the unhappy Ishmaelites in literature, with their morbid and weird
ideas? They both lost in infancy or early childhood mothers to whom
they were greatly attached.
Facts like these have great significance. It is not claimed that other
factors do not go into the making of the man, but his relations with
his parents is the earliest cause in determining his mental, moral
and emotional make up. A man who hates his father sees in many of his
future enemies the image of his father. One who is overattached to
his mother looks unconsciously for her counterpart, among women, in
seeking his mate. He sees a reminder of his father in those people who
interfere with his plans, ambitions and conduct. He sees the father in
the rivals he has in love affairs, just as in infancy he found in his
father his rival in the affections of his mother. This seemingly absurd
and repellent view has been scientifically demonstrated by Freud and
his disciples so that I refer objectors to it to their works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account