The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and MausoleumCalvert, Albert Frederick
History
The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and Mausoleum
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Escorial
The first stone was laid on April 23, 1563. Toledo worked upon the
Escorial till 1567, when he died. His scheme embraced the monastery for
fifty Hieronymite monks, the royal residence, the burial-chamber, and
the church. Juan Bautista de Toledo was succeeded by Juan de Herrera,
who enlarged the convent and designed a bell tower. His assistant was
Juan de Minjores, who had executed the church of the Alhambra, and
planned part of the Alcazar of Seville.
Toledo’s plan was ambitious and eccentric. He was influenced by the
Renaissance ideals, and he employed the Doric style in its severest
examples. Philip would have no luxurious decorations, no flamboyant
effects; everything must be plain to austerity. Some critics have
asserted that the simplicity of the Escorial is impressive and noble,
while others complain of its rigidity and sombreness. The plan of the
building is in the shape of a gridiron, to commemorate, it is surmised,
the fate of San Lorenzo, who was roasted on a grid. The handle of the
gridiron is represented by the Palace of the Infantas; the monastery,
the seminary, and the royal apartments represent the bars of the
implement upon which the saint was martyred.
It is evident that the architects were not allowed perfect freedom in
their designs. The king constantly inspected their plans, corrected or
improved them according to his own ideas, and made numerous suggestions.
From his youth Philip had displayed a love of architecture, and there is
no doubt that he was personally the inventor of many features of the
Escorial. It has been related that he somewhat hampered the designers by
his frequent insistence upon severity of style, and by his interference
in many details of the work.
The king often repaired to a rock commanding a view of the busy scene
beneath, where he would sit for hours, watching the progress made by the
great army of craftsmen and toilers. A fear, which was almost morbid,
assailed him at the dread thought that he might die before his scheme
was brought to its completion. His days were occupied in superintending
the tasks of the architects, artists, and decorators, and in pious
meditation in his retreat. Sometimes he would roam with his gun, in the
surrounding grey wilderness, unattended, and buried in reflection. His
relations with the favourite painters of his retinue were of the
friendliest order, and he avoided the attitude of the mere patron. With
Titian the king was very intimate, and he would sit by the easel of
Coello, watching the picture that grew upon the canvas.
The studio of Coello adjoined the royal apartment, and Philip came
frequently to converse with the painter. He delighted also in the
society of Antonio Moro. To Titian he paid large sums for his services,
and when the work was finished the king handsomely pensioned the artist.
When Titian died, the pension was continued to his son.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account