The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and MausoleumCalvert, Albert Frederick
History
The Escorial: A Historical and Descriptive Account of the Spanish Royal Palace, Monastery and Mausoleum
Calvert, Albert Frederick
Escorial
Cranes and levers were employed for lifting the huge blocks of stone
quarried from the surrounding mountains. Even the rough work was
allotted only to workmen of approved ability and reputed industry, while
the task of decoration was given to masters of the arts of painting,
illuminating, and carving in wood, metal, and ivory. Upon this bleak
highland a busy colony of toilers from many parts of Europe sprang up in
a few months. Forges, workshops, and saw-pits were set up or constructed
amongst the _scoriæ_ or shale of the mountains, and the desert rang with
the beating of hammers on metal, the clicking of the mason’s chisel, and
the grating of the saws.
An immense number of carts and horses were employed, besides
pannier-mules and asses, to bring the stone from the quarries and the
metal from distant furnaces.
Only a part of the work was performed at the Escorial. The bronze was
compounded in Zaragoza; the white marble came from the Sierras de
Filabres, and the green, black, and variegated marbles were brought from
the mountains of Andalusia, while Cuenca and Segovia furnished part of
the pine wood. Many of the figures of bronze for the altars were
designed and made in Florence and Milan. Toledo supplied lamps,
candlesticks, crosses, and incense-burners. Holland provided heavy
bronze candle-holders. Spain, Italy, and Flanders were searched for
precious stones and metals to beautify the building, and artists and
craftsmen were imported from many countries.
Juan Bautista de Toledo, and his pupil Juan de Herrera, expended great
care and pains in the designs. Models of the various parts of the
Escorial were made in wood, and the designs were altered and improved by
both architects from time to time. Under the direction of Juan de
Herrera every detail of the building was submitted to him for his
approval before it was finished. Even the designs of Peregrino and
Flecha, the Italian masters, were submitted to the inspection of the
master-architect. Juan de Herrera was succeeded by Francisco de Mora as
chief architect.
The construction of the Principal Choir was a part of the work upon
which much forethought was expended. Father Sigüenza describes the
Corinthian style of the choir as the most beautiful feature of the
Church. He mentions one hundred and twenty-eight as the number of the
seats.
The Retablo was a costly piece of work, as a large quantity of jasper
and precious metal was used in its embellishment, and much gilt
employed. The columns are of the Doric order, and the bases are formed
of gilded bronze.
Father Sigüenza does not stint his praise for the ‘judicious architects
and singular painters’ employed by Philip II. at the Escorial, and his
book is characterised by a high enthusiasm for the king, and admiration
for the great work, ‘this sumptuous fabric,’ in which the worthy _padre_
spent so many years of his life as Director of the Royal Library.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account