The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc. — John Shaqi
The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc.Schopenhauer, Arthur
Philosophy
The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc.
Schopenhauer, Arthur
Philosophy; Religion
My consolation is that, alike in controversies and in taking mineral
waters, the after effects are the true ones.
_Demopheles_. Well, I hope it'll be beneficial in your case.
_Philalethes_. It might be so, if I could digest a certain Spanish
proverb.
_Demopheles_. Which is?
_Philalethes. Behind the cross stands the devil_.
_Demopheles_. Come, don't let us part with sarcasms. Let us rather admit
that religion, like Janus, or better still, like the Brahman god of
death, Yama, has two faces, and like him, one friendly, the other
sullen. Each of us has kept his eye fixed on one alone.
_Philalethes_. You are right, old fellow.
A FEW WORDS ON PANTHEISM.
The controversy between Theism and Pantheism might be presented in an
allegorical or dramatic form by supposing a dialogue between two persons
in the pit of a theatre at Milan during the performance of a piece. One
of them, convinced that he is in Girolamo's renowned marionette-theatre,
admires the art by which the director gets up the dolls and guides their
movements. "Oh, you are quite mistaken," says the other, "we're in the
Teatro della Scala; it is the manager and his troupe who are on the
stage; they are the persons you see before you; the poet too is taking a
part."
The chief objection I have to Pantheism is that it says nothing. To call
the world "God" is not to explain it; it is only to enrich our language
with a superfluous synonym for the word "world." It comes to the same
thing whether you say "the world is God," or "God is the world." But if
you start from "God" as something that is given in experience, and has
to be explained, and they say, "God is the world," you are affording
what is to some extent an explanation, in so far as you are reducing
what is unknown to what is partly known (_ignotum per notius_); but it
is only a verbal explanation. If, however, you start from what is really
given, that is to say, from the world, and say, "the world is God," it
is clear that you say nothing, or at least you are explaining what is
unknown by what is more unknown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account