The Essays of "George Eliot": CompleteEliot, George
History
The Essays of "George Eliot": Complete
Eliot, George
Literature -- History and criticism
“The truth is, I now see Coleridge’s talk and speculation was the
emblem of himself. In it, as in him, a ray of heavenly inspiration
struggled, in a tragically ineffectual degree, with the weakness of
flesh and blood. He says once, he ‘had skirted the howling deserts
of infidelity.’ This was evident enough; but he had not had the
courage, in defiance of pain and terror, to press resolutely across
said deserts to the new firm lands of faith beyond; he preferred to
create logical _fata-morganas_ for himself on this hither side, and
laboriously solace himself with these.”
The above mentioned step of Sterling—his entering the Church—is the point
on which Carlyle is most decidedly at issue with Archdeacon Hare. The
latter holds that had Sterling’s health permitted him to remain in the
Church, he would have escaped those aberrations from orthodoxy, which, in
the clerical view, are to be regarded as the failure and shipwreck of his
career, apparently thinking, like that friend of Arnold’s who recommended
a curacy as the best means of clearing up Trinitarian difficulties, that
“orders” are a sort of spiritual backboard, which, by dint of obliging a
man to look as if he were strait, end by making him so. According to
Carlyle, on the contrary, the real “aberration” of Sterling was his
choice of the clerical profession, which was simply a mistake as to his
true vocation:
“Sterling,” he says, “was not intrinsically, nor had ever been in the
highest or chief degree, a devotional mind. Of course all excellence
in man, and worship as the supreme excellence, was part of the
inheritance of this gifted man; but if called to define him, I should
say artist, not saint, was the real bent of his being.”
Again:
“No man of Sterling’s veracity, had he clearly consulted his own
heart, or had his own heart been capable of clearly responding, and
not been bewildered by transient fantasies and theosophic moonshine,
could have undertaken this function. His heart would have answered,
‘No, thou canst not. What is incredible to thee, thou shalt not, at
thy soul’s peril, attempt to believe! Elsewhither for a refuge, or
die here. Go to perdition if thou must, but not with a lie in thy
mouth; by the eternal Maker, no!’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account