[125] Art. i., 8: 1. Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U. S., 321 (1885); Kelly _v._ Pittsburgh, 104 U. S., 78 (1881); French _v._ Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 181 U. S., 324 (1901); Veazie Bank _v._ Fenne, 8 Wallace, 533 (1869); Corporation Tax Cases, 220 U. S., 611 (1911). [126] South Carolina _v._ United States, 199 U. S., 437 (1905). The State conducted dispensatories and derived profit from them. It was held liable for internal revenue. The exercise by the State, as a dispenser, was held not to exempt it from the operation of the law. [127] Art. i., viii., 3. [128] Brig Wilson _v._ U. S., 1 Brockenbrough, 437 (1820). [129] See decision of the Supreme Court sustaining the “Webb-Kenyon” Law decommercializing (interstate) intoxicating liquors, Clark Distilling Company _v._ W. Md. R. R. Co.; _Id._ _v._ Am. Ex. Co. and State of W. Va. (January 8, 1917). The power of Congress to deal with the hours of work and wages of employees engaged in interstate commerce is examined in Wilson _v._ New and Ferris, Receivers, Mo. Ok., & G. Railway Co., March 19, 1917. (Constitutionality of the “Adamson” law.) [130] Art. vi., 2. [131] Marbury _v._ Madison, 1 Cranch, 177 (1803). [132] McCulloch _v._ Maryland, 4 Wheaton, 430 (1819). [133] Brown _v._ Maryland, 12 Wheaton, 419 (1827). [134] Gibbons _v._ Ogden, 9 Wheaton, 1 (1824). [135] Pensacola Telegraph Co. _v._ Western Union Telegraph Co., 96 U. S., 1 (1877). [136] So in Gibbon _v._ Ogden, _supra_. [137] Henderson _v._ Mayor of New York, 92 U. S., 259 (1875); L. S. & M. S. Railway Co. _v._ Ohio, 173 U. S. (1899); Railroad Co. _v._ Husen, 95 U. S., 465 (1877); Brimmer _v._ Rebman, 138 U. S., 78 (1891); Morgan’s S. S. Co. _v._ Louisiana Board of Health, 118 U. S., 455 (1886); Leisy _v._ Hardin, 135 U. S., 100 (1890); Schellenberger _v._ Pennsylvania, 171 U. S., 1 (1898). [138] The trend of these respective lines is disclosed by the decisions in the cases cited in this Chapter. [139] Pensacola Telegraph Co. _v._ Western Union Telegraph Co., 96 U. S., 1 (1877). The important word here is “jurisdiction.” “To bring the transportation within the control of the State, as part of its domestic commerce, the subject transported must be within the entire voyage under the exclusive jurisdiction of the State.” Hanley _v._ Kansas City Southern Railroad Co., 187 U. S., 617 (1903). The Immigration Law (February 20, 1897, amended March 26, 1910), contains the protective features the State would demand through exercise of its police power. So too the Federal Meat Inspection Act (March 4, 1907). [140] _The Daniel Ball_, 10 Wallace, 557 (1870). [141] Act of Congress, March 2, 1893.