The Essentials of American Constitutional LawThorpe, Francis Newton
History
The Essentials of American Constitutional Law
Thorpe, Francis Newton
Constitutional law -- United States
[351] The power of Congress over territory incorporated into the
United States,—that is, over territory over which the Constitution has
been extended by Congress is limited by the Constitution: Thompson
_v._ Utah, 170 U. S., 343 (1898). Rasmussen _v._ United States, 197
U. S., 516 (1905); but over territory _not so incorporated_, see
Hawaii _v._ Mankichi, 190 U. S., 197 (1903); Dorr _v._ U. S., 195
U. S., 138 (1904). The decisions support the doctrine that once the
Constitution has been extended over territory, it cannot be withdrawn
(Downes _v._ Bidwell) and consequently, all the limitations which by
the Constitution affect Congress operate as limitations of its power
over the territory, and therefore operate as fundamental rights and
privileges of the inhabitants of such territory.
[352] So throughout _The Federalist_, and notably in Nos. xliv., xlv.,
li.
[353] But note the Sixteenth Amendment.
[354] First Inaugural. _Works_ (Century Ed.), ii., 7.
[355] Art. ii., 1: 2; Amendment XII.
[356] In 1787 distrust of the people, among the framers of the
Constitution, explains the constitutional provision. James Wilson urged
election of the President by popular vote. South Carolina in 1860 was
the last State to appoint presidential electors by its Legislature.
There is widespread belief in America now that the President should be
elected by direct popular vote, as are Congressmen and United States
Senators. At present the “electoral vote” is 531; the person receiving
the majority of these 531 votes is President of the United States.
By American laws there are upwards of 20,000,000 voters; by American
constitutional law, the person receiving 266 “electoral” votes is
President.
[357] Art. ii., 2: 1.
[358] _Id._ 3.
[359] Cincinnati, Wilmington, etc., R. R. Co. _v._ Commissioners, 1
Ohio St., 88; and see a full discussion of the issue in Field _v._
Clark, 143 U. S., 649 (1892).
Thus technically, the veto power is not a legislative but an executive
power, though it is common to speak of the participation of the
executive in legislation.
[360] Art. i., 2: 5; 3: 6. The subject is discussed in Chapters VII and
VIII.
[361] Art. i., 8: 1.
[362] _Id._, 8: 12. In practice appropriations are for one year; if the
purpose for which the appropriation was made is not effected within the
year, the appropriation ceases to be available, unless to the contrary
as declared in the law; but an unexpended appropriation may be made
available (sometimes) by resolution of Congress, or even of the branch
of Congress specially concerned.
[363] Art. i., 8: 16.
[364] _Id._, 9: 3. The limitation as to prohibition of the slave trade
was temporary. _Id._, 9: 1.
[365] _Id._, 9: 5.
[366] _Id._, 9: 6.
[367] Art. i., 9: 8.
[368] _Id._, 5: 4.
[369] _Id._, 7: 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account