The Essentials of American Constitutional LawThorpe, Francis Newton
History
The Essentials of American Constitutional Law
Thorpe, Francis Newton
Constitutional law -- United States
[370] _Id._, 6: 2. This is a limitation of the freedom of choice
of certain individuals rather than a limitation of Congress as a
legislative body; but what is forbidden to a member of Congress cannot
be made lawful for him by act of Congress; thus the limitation may
be one of legislation. The provision (Art. i., 9: 2) concerning the
suspension of the writ of _habeas corpus_ is not a limitation of the
power of Congress, for Congress is the judge whether public safety
requires the suspension of the writ.
[371] Art. iii., 3: 1, 2.
[372] Art. iii., 3: 2; _Id._ i., 9: 3.
[373] _Id._ iv., 3: 1.
[374] _Id._, 3: 2.
[375] The first ten Amendments were demanded in 1787–8 as specific
limitations of legislative power of the United States, and as a
protection of fundamental, original rights of the people.
[376] The history of these Amendments in the author’s _Constitutional
History of the United States_, ii., 199–263.
[377] First Amendment.
[378] Amendments II., III., IV., V.
[379] See the Ninth Amendment.
[380] It will be noticed that this Amendment is not a limitation of the
States; it applies to the United States.
[381] This is brought out by Marshall in Marbury _v._ Madison, 1
Cranch, 137,—the corner-stone of many later decisions.
[382] The limitations of the States by the Constitution of the United
States have already been discussed in earlier chapters. Examination
of present State constitutions will disclose existing limitations
prescribed by the sovereignty, the people of the State.
[383] Art. i., 4: 1. The right to vote for members of Congress has its
foundation in the Constitution of the United States, not in that of
any State: Wiley _v._ Sinkler, 179 U. S., 58; _Ex parte_ Yarbrough,
110 U. S., 651. This means a limitation of State powers,—as some might
say; in strictness, it means a definition of federal powers; the
jurisdiction of a State cannot exclude the jurisdiction of the United
States.
[384] _Id._, 8: 17.
[385] No. lxii. (The authorship, strictly speaking, is uncertain, being
assigned “to Hamilton _or_ Madison.”)
[386] Art. i., 10: 1.
[387] Art. i., 10: 2, 3.
[388] _Id._ ii., 2: 1.
[389] _Id._ iii., 2: 2.
[390] Amendment XI.
[391] Amendment XIII.
[392] Amendment XIV.
[393] _Id._
[394] Art. i., 2: 3.
[395] _Id._ v.
[396] _Id._ i., 2: 4. Amendment XVII., 2.
[397] Art. iv., 1: 2.
[398] Amendment XII.
[399] Art. ii., 2: 2.
[400] _Id._ iv., 2: 1.
[401] _Id._, 4. But the Governor cannot so apply if the Legislature is
in session. The reason here is that the people of the State have fully
empowered their representatives in the Legislature “to see that the
Commonwealth suffers no harm.”
[402] Art. v.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account