The Essentials of American Constitutional Law — John Shaqi
The Essentials of American Constitutional LawThorpe, Francis Newton
History
The Essentials of American Constitutional Law
Thorpe, Francis Newton
Constitutional law -- United States
A ministerial duty, the performance of which may, in proper cases,
be required of the head of a department, by judicial process, is
one in which respect to nothing is left to discretion. It is a
simple, definite duty, arising under conditions admitted or proved
to exist, and imposed by law.[238]
This means that where the law requires the performance of a single
specific act, there is no room for the exercise of judgment, there is
nothing left to discretion; the act is ministerial. “Very different
is the duty of the President in the exercise of the power to see that
the laws are faithfully executed,—the duty thus imposed is in no sense
ministerial; it is purely executive and political.”[239]
In application of this principle
The Congress is the legislative department of the government; the
President is the executive department. Neither can be restrained
in its action by the judicial department; though the acts of both,
when performed, are, in proper cases, subject to cognizance.[240]
95. The principle applies alike to the States. The control of the
exercise of powers belonging exclusively to the executive department
of the government of a State can in no sense or degree be assumed by
either of the other departments, as such control would amount to the
performance of executive duties by the legislative or the judiciary, a
confusion of functions distinctly forbidden by the constitution. And
it has been decided that “_mandamus_ will not issue to the Governor to
compel the performance of _any_ duty pertaining to his office, whether
political or merely ministerial; whether commanded by the constitution
or by some law passed on the subject.”[241]
The principle of American constitutional law as to executive and
ministerial powers is thus stated:
The Court will not interfere by _mandamus_ with the executive
officers of the government in the exercise of their ordinary
official duties, even where those duties require an interpretation
of the law, the Court having no appellate power for that purpose;
but when they refuse to act in a case at all, or when by special
statute, or otherwise, a more ministerial duty is imposed upon
them, that is, a service which they are bound to perform without
further question, then, if they refuse, a _mandamus_ may be issued
to compel them.[242]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account