The Essentials of Good Skirmishing: To which are added a brief system of common light infantry drillGawler, George
History
The Essentials of Good Skirmishing: To which are added a brief system of common light infantry drill
Gawler, George
Infantry drill and tactics; Skirmishing
It is well that it should be so; for if it be indeed true, as some
insinuate, that the British soldier falls somewhat below his continental
brethren in the policy of skirmishing, this important essential,
_persevering unflinching courage_, will ever, as it always has done,
make up for minor deficiencies, and carry him triumphantly through.
It is useful to observe, how much the flinching practice of foreign
light infantry has influenced, and perhaps been influenced by, their
systems of drill. The old method, which we borrowed from them, of firing
advancing by alternate ranks or files, may be practicable with long
shots and cautious movements, but is only partially applicable to the
service practice of British light infantry, who, even when close to
their enemy, count it most unsoldier-like to fire without an immediately
important purpose in view; who seldom fire at all until within two
hundred yards of their object;[7] and who, after a few quiet shots to
get within the length of their breath and to draw on the enemy’s fire,
dash at the opposing line of defence with that peculiar rush which may
be called “the skirmishers’ charge.”[8]
The present established mode of advancing firing by “single line,” is
that into which daring skirmishers always do, and of necessity always
must, fall. On the drill ground, when required, this mode may be
completed to a perfect copy of “the skirmishers’ charge,” by the sound
“double quick” at about eighty yards from the supposed enemy’s line of
defence. The whole then, still partially firing, dash on at an
accelerated pace, until, the cover gained, “the halt” is sounded, to
take breath behind it, and prepare for another forward effort.
IV.
Conduct which in some cases, under fire, is disgraceful, in others is
meritorious. The man in the ranks who shrinks away from a shell or
cannon ball, or who goes out of his commanded course to cover himself
from musquetry, has little claim to the name of a _brave_ soldier; while
he who in a trench or battery does not bow low at the cry “shot,” or
fall prostrate before a blazing shell, _or who in a skirmish neglects to
make the best of every foot of cover_, has no right, to the title of a
wise one.
The difference arises from the line of military perfection being struck,
not according to what will suit or save the individual, but by that
which will benefit the general service.
Between the duties peculiar to compact fighting and skirmishing, the
distinction should be drawn broad and deep on the drill field; because
on the battle field, it is natural on either side to be forgetful.
There are two kinds of cover—_ball proof_ cover, and _mere concealing_
cover. Ragged rocks, large trees, brick and stone walls and buildings,
stout fences and thick mud-banks, constitute generally the first class;
young plantations, gorse and underwood, hedges, abattis, slight fences
and narrow sand hills, the second.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account