The essentials of mysticism, and other essaysUnderhill, Evelyn
Religion
The essentials of mysticism, and other essays
Underhill, Evelyn
Mysticism
_The Mirror of Simple Souls_, as we now have it, is a work of nearly
60,000 words in length. So far from being simple, it deals almost
exclusively with the rarest and most sublime aspects of spiritual
experience. Its theme is the theme of all mysticism: the soul’s
adventures on its way towards union with God. It is not, like the
_Melum_ of Richard Rolle, or _Revelations_ of Julian of Norwich, a
subjective book; the record of personal experiences and actual
“conversations in heaven.” Rather it is objective and didactic, a work
of geography, not a history of travel; an advanced text-book of the
contemplative life. Only from the ardour and exactitude of its
descriptions, its strange air of authority, its defiance of pious
convention, can we gather that it is the fruit of first-hand experience,
not merely of theological study: though its writer was clearly a trained
theologian, familiar with the works of St. Augustine and Dionysius the
Areopagite, whom no mystic of the Middle Ages wholly escaped, and
apparently with those of St. Bernard, Hugh and Richard of St. Victor,
and other mediæval authorities on the inner life.
I have said that the _Mirror_, as we have it, purports to be the
translation of an unknown French treatise. This translation, so far as
we can judge from its language, was probably made in the early years of
the fifteenth century, perhaps at the end of the fourteenth. Its author,
then, lived at the close of the golden age of English mysticism: he was
the contemporary of Julian of Norwich, who was still living in 1413, and
of Walter Hilton, who died in 1395. Himself a mystic, he was no servile
translator; rather the eager interpreter of the book which he wished to
make accessible to his countrymen. Our manuscripts begin with his
prologue: an ingenuous confession of the difficulties of the
undertaking, his own temerity in daring to touch these “high divine
matters,” his fear lest the book should fall into unsuitable hands and
its more extreme teachings be misunderstood. It appears from this
prologue that our version of the _Mirror_ is a second, or revised
edition; the first having failed to be comprehensible to its readers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account