The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“A man who lives in pleasure [_i.e._, in selfish luxury] is dead
while he lives, for he lives only to his belly. In his other senses
he lives not. He sees not what he ought to see; he hears not what
he ought to hear; he speaks not what he ought to speak.... Look not
at the superficial countenance, but examine the interior, and you
will see it full of deep dejection. If it were possible to bring
the soul into view, and to behold it with our bodily eyes, that of
the luxurious would seem depressed, mournful, miserable, and wasted
with leanness, for the more the body grows sleek and gross, the
more lean and weakly is the soul. The more the one is pampered,
the more is the other hampered [θάλπεται--θάπτεται: the latter
meaning, literally, buried]. As when the pupil of the eye has the
external envelope too thick, it cannot put forth the power of
vision and look out, because the light is excluded by the dense
covering, and darkness ensues; so when the body is constantly full
fed, the soul must be invested with grossness. The dead, say you,
corrupt and rot, and a foul pestilential humour distils from them.
So in her who lives in pleasure may be seen rheums, and phlegm,
and catarrh, hiccough, vomiting, eructations, and the like, which,
as too unseemly, I forbear to name. For such is the despotism of
luxury, it makes us endure things which we do not think proper even
to mention....
“‘She that lives in pleasure is dead while she lives.’ Hear this,
ye women[95] who pass your time in revels and intemperance, and who
neglect the poor, pining and perishing with hunger, whilst you are
destroying yourselves with continual luxury. Thus you are the cause
of two deaths--of those who are dying of want and of your own, both
through ill-measure. If, out of your fulness, you tempered their
want, you would save two lives. Why do you thus gorge your own body
with excess, and waste that of the poor with want? Consider what
comes of food--into what it is changed. Are you not disgusted at
its being named? Why, then, be eager for such accumulations? The
increase of luxury is but the multiplication of filth.[96] For
Nature has her limits, and what is beyond these is not nourishment,
but injury and the increase of ordure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account