The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Let him shew me, by the most skilful argument, upon what
foundations he has built these excessive prerogatives which he
supposes himself to have over other existences. Who has persuaded
him that that admirable impulse of the celestial vault, the eternal
brightness of those Lights rolling so majestically over our heads,
the tremendous motions of that infinite sea of Globes, were
established and have continued so many ages for his advantage and
for his service. Is it possible to imagine anything so ridiculous
as that this pitiful [_chétive_], miserable creature, who is not
even master of himself, exposed to injuries of every kind, should
call itself master and lord of the universe, of which, so far from
being lord of it, he knows but the smallest part?... Who has given
him this sealed charter? Let him shew us the ‘letters patent’ of
this grand commission. Have they been issued [_octroyées_] in
favour of the wise only? They affect but the few in that case. The
fools and the wicked--are they worthy of so extraordinary a favour,
and being the worst part of the world [_le pire pièce du monde_],
do they deserve to be preferred to all the rest? Shall we believe
all this?
“Presumption is our natural and original disease. The most
calamitous and fragile of all creatures is man, and yet the most
arrogant.[114] It is through the vanity of this same imagination
that he equals himself to a god, that he attributes to himself
divine conditions, that he picks himself out and separates himself
from the crowd of other creatures, curtails the just shares of
other animals his brethren [_confrères_] and companions, and
assigns to them such portions of faculties and forces as seems to
him good. How does he know, by the effort of his intelligence, the
interior and secret movements and impulses of other animals? By
what comparison between them and us does he infer the stupidity
[_la bétise_] which he attributes to them?”
Montaigne quotes the example of his master, the just and benevolent
Plutarch, who made it a matter of justice and conscience not to sell
or send to the slaughter-house (according to the common selfish
ingratitude) a Cow who had served him faithfully and profitably for so
many years. With Plutarch and Porphyry he never wearies of denouncing
the unreasoning opinions, or rather prejudices, prevalent amongst men
as to the mental qualities of many of the non-human races, and, as we
have already seen, insists that the difference between them and us is
of _degree_ and not of _kind_:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account