The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Plato, in his picture of the ‘Golden Age,’ reckons amongst the
chief advantages of the men of that time the communication they had
with other animals, by investigating and instructing themselves in
whose nature they learned their true qualities and the differences
between them, by which they acquired a very perfect knowledge and
intelligence, and thus made their lives more happy than we can make
ours. Is a better test needed by which to judge of human folly in
regard to other species?
“I have said all this in order to bring us back and reunite
ourselves to the crowd [_presse_]. We are [in the accidents of
mortality] neither above nor below the rest. ‘All who are under
the sky,’ says the Jewish sage, ‘experience a like law and fate.’
There is some difference, _there are orders and degrees_, but
they are under the aspect of one and the same nature. Man must be
constrained and ranged within the barriers of this police [_Il
faut contraindre l’homme, et le ranger dans les barrières de cette
police_]. The wretch has no right to encroach [_d’enjamber_]
beyond these; he is fettered, entangled, he is subjected to like
necessities with other creatures of his order, and in a very
mean condition without any true and essential prerogative and
pre-excellence. That which he confers upon himself by his own
opinion and fancy has neither sense nor substance; and if it be
conceded to him that he alone of all animals has that freedom of
imagination and that irregularity of thought representing to him
what he is, what he is not, and what he wants, the false and the
true, it is an advantage which has been very dearly sold to him,
and of which he has very little to boast, for from that springs the
principal source of the evils which oppress him--crime, disease,
irresolution, trouble, despair.”
Rejecting the still received prejudice which will not allow our humble
fellow-beings the privilege of reason, but invents an imaginary faculty
called “instinct,” he repeats that--
“There is no ground for supposing that other beings do by
_natural and necessary inclination_ the same things that we do
by choice, and while we are bound to infer from like effects
like faculties--nay, from greater effects, greater faculties--we
are forced to confess, consequently, that that same reason, that
same method which we employ in action are also employed by the
lower animals, or else that they have some still better reason
or method. Why do we fancy in them that natural necessity or
impulse [_contrainte_]--_we_ who have no experience of that sort
ourselves.[115]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account