The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Man, and the other animals whom he has afflicted with his malady
or depraved by his dominion, are _alone diseased_. The Bison,
the wild Hog, the Wolf, are perfectly exempt from malady, and
invariably die either from external violence or from mature old
age. But the domestic Hog, the Sheep, the Cow, the Dog, are subject
to an incredible variety of distempers, and, like the corruptors
of their nature, have physicians who thrive upon their miseries.
The super-eminence of man is, like Satan’s, the super-eminence of
pain; and the majority of his species, doomed to penury, disease,
and crime, have reason to curse the untoward event that, by
enabling him to communicate his sensations, raised him above the
level of his fellow-animals. But the steps that have been taken
are irrevocable. The whole of human science is comprised in one
question: How can the advantages of intellect and civilisation be
reconciled with the liberty and pure pleasures of natural life?
How can we take the benefits and reject the evils of the system
which is now interwoven with the fibre of our being? I believe
that abstinence from animal food and spirituous liquors would, in
a great measure, capacitate us for the solution of this important
question.
“It is true that mental and bodily derangements are attributable,
in part, to other deviations from rectitude and nature than those
which concern diet. The mistakes cherished by society respecting
the connexion of the sexes, whence the misery and diseases of
unsatisfied celibacy, unenjoyed prostitution, and the premature
arrival of puberty, necessarily spring. The putrid atmosphere of
crowded cities, the exhalations of chemical processes, the muffling
of our bodies in superfluous apparel, the absurd treatment of
infants--all these, and innumerable other causes, contribute their
mite to the mass of human evil.
“Comparative Anatomy teaches us that man resembles the frugivorous
animals in everything, the carnivorous in nothing. He has neither
claws wherewith to seize his prey, nor distinct and pointed teeth
to tear the living fibre. A mandarin of the first class, with
nails two inches long, would probably find them alone inefficient
to hold even a hare. After every subterfuge of gluttony, the bull
must be degraded into the “ox,” and the ram into the “wether,” by
an unnatural and inhuman operation, that the flaccid fibre may
offer a fainter resistance to rebellious nature. It is only by
softening and disguising dead flesh by culinary preparation that it
is rendered susceptible of mastication or digestion, and that the
sight of its bloody juice and raw horror does not excite loathing
and disgust.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account