The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
Of his creed, the article which he most firmly held, and which,
perhaps, most distinguishes him from ordinary thinkers, was the
_Perfectibility_ of his species, and his firm faith in the ultimate
triumph of Good. “He believed,” says the one authority who had the
best means of knowing his thought and feeling, “that mankind had only
to _will_ that there should be no evil, and there would be none. It is
not my part in these notes to criticise the arguments that have been
urged against this opinion, but to mention the fact that he entertained
it, and was, indeed, attached to it with fervent enthusiasm. That man
could be so perfectionised as to be able to expel Evil from his own
nature, and from the greater part of the world, was the cardinal point
of his system. And the subject he liked best to dwell upon was the
image of One warring with an evil principle, oppressed not only by it
but by all, even the good, who were deluded into considering evil a
_necessary_ portion of humanity--a victim full of gratitude and of hope
and of the spirit of triumph emanating from a reliance in the ultimate
omnipotence of Good.” Such was the conviction which inspired his
greatest poem _The Prometheus Unbound_.
A principal charm of his poetry is that which repels the common class
of readers: “He loved to _idealise_ reality, and this is a task shared
by few. We are willing to have our passing whims exalted into passions,
for this gratifies our vanity. But few of us understand or sympathise
with the endeavour to ally the love of abstract beauty and adoration
of abstract Good with sympathies with our own kind.”[243] Of so rare a
spirit it is peculiarly interesting to know something of the outward
form:--
“His features [describes one of his biographers] were not
symmetrical--the mouth, perhaps, excepted. Yet the effect of the
whole was extremely powerful. They breathed an animation, a fire,
an enthusiasm, a vivid and preternatural intelligence, that I never
met with in any other countenance. Nor was the moral expression
less beautiful than the intellectual: for there was a softness, a
delicacy, a gentleness, and especially (though this will surprise
many) that air of profound religious veneration that characterises
the best works, and chiefly the frescoes, of the great Masters of
Florence and of Rome.
“His eyes were blue, unfathomably dark and lustrous. His hair was
brown: but very early in life it became grey, while his unwrinkled
face retained to the last a look of wonderful youth. It is admitted
on all sides that no adequate picture was ever painted of him.
Mulready is reported to have said that he was too beautiful to
paint. And yet, although so singularly lovely, he owed less of his
charm to regularity of feature, or to grace of movement, than to an
indescribable personal fascination.”
As to his voice, impressions varied:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account