The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“6. _Because_ the destruction of the mechanical organisation of
vegetables inflicts no sensible suffering, nor violates any moral
feeling, while vegetables serve to sustain his health, strength,
and spirits above those of most carnivorous men.
“7. _Because_ during thirty years of rigid abstinence from the
flesh and juices of deceased sensitive beings, he finds that he has
not suffered a day’s serious illness, that his animal strength and
vigour have been equal or superior to that of other men, and that
his mind has been fully equal to numerous shocks which he has had
to encounter from malice, envy, and various acts of turpitude in
his fellow-men.
“8. _Because_ observing that carnivorous propensities among animals
are accompanied by a total want of sympathetic feelings and gentle
sentiments--as in the Hyæna, the Tiger, the Vulture, the Eagle, the
Crocodile, and the Shark--he conceives that the practice of these
carnivorous tyrants affords no worthy example for the imitation or
justification of rational, reflecting, and _conscientious_ beings.
“9. _Because_ he observes that carnivorous men, unrestrained by
reflection or sentiment, even refine on the most cruel practices
of the most savage animals [of other species], and apply their
resources of mind and art to prolong the miseries of the victims
of their appetites--bleeding, skinning, roasting, and boiling
animals alive, and torturing them without reservation or remorse,
if they thereby add to the variety or the delicacy of their
carnivorous gluttony.
“10. _Because_ the natural sentiments and sympathies of human
beings, in regard to the killing of other animals, are generally
so averse from the practice that few men or women could devour the
animals whom _they might be obliged themselves to kill_; and yet
they forget, or affect to forget, the living endearments or dying
sufferings of the being, while they are wantoning over his remains.
“11. _Because_ the human stomach appears to be naturally so averse
from receiving the remains of animals, that few could partake
of them if they were not disguised and flavoured by culinary
preparation; yet rational beings ought to feel that the prepared
substances are not the less what they truly are, and _that no
disguise of food, in itself loathsome_, ought to delude the
unsophisticated perceptions of a considerate mind.
“12. _Because_ the forty-seven millions of acres in England and
Wales _would maintain in abundance as many human inhabitants_,
if they lived wholly on grain, fruits, and vegetables; but they
sustain only twelve millions [in 1811] _scantily_, while animal
food is made the basis of human subsistence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account