The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Though it is known that the Hindus and other Eastern peoples live
wholly on rice--that the Irish and Scotch peasantry subsist on
potatoes and oatmeal--and that the labouring poor of all countries
live on the food, of which an acre yields one hundred times more
than of flesh, while they enjoy unabated health and long life--yet
an endless play of sophistry is maintained about the alleged
necessity of killing and devouring animals.
“At twelve years of age the author of this volume was struck with
such horror in accidentally seeing the barbarities of a London
slaughter-house, that since that hour he has never eaten anything
but vegetables. He persevered, in spite of vulgar forebodings,
with unabated vigorous health; and at sixty-six finds himself more
able to undergo any fatigue of mind and body than any other person
of his age. He quotes himself because the case, in so carnivorous
a country, is uncommon--especially in the grades of society in
which he has been accustomed to live.... On principle he does not
abstain from any _vegetable_ luxuries or from fermented liquors;
but any indulgence in the latter requires (he hastens to add) the
correction of carbonate of soda. He is always in better health when
water is his sole beverage; and such is the case with all who have
imitated his practice.”[251]
Under the article “Farming,” he observes that “a man who eats 1lb.
of flesh eats the exact equivalent of 6lbs. of wheat, and 128lbs. of
potatoes.” That is, that he, in such proportion, wastes the national
resources of a country.
The High Sheriff, on the occasion of some petition to the King, had
been knighted, (to the affected scandal of his political enemies, who,
apparently, wished to reserve all titular or other recognition for
their own party), and the conspicuous beneficence of his career, while
in office, had gained for him an honourable popularity. But fortune,
so long favourable, now for a time showed itself adverse. In 1809
his affairs became embarrassed, and recourse to the bankruptcy court
inevitable. Happily his friends aided him in saving from the general
wreck the copyright of the _Monthly Magazine_. Its management was a
chief occupation of his remaining years; and his own contributions,
under the signature of “Common Sense,” attracted marked attention.
In his publishing career, the most curious incident was the refusal
of the MSS. of _Waverley_. The author’s demands seem to have been in
excess of the value placed upon the novel by the publisher. It had been
advertised in the first instance (he tells us) as the production of Mr.
W. Scott. The name was then withdrawn, and the famous novel came before
the world anonymously.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account