The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh EatingWilliams, Howard
Philosophy
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh Eating
Williams, Howard
Diet; Vegetarianism
“Alas for our savage inhumanity! It is a terrible thing to see
the table of rich men decked out by those layers out of corpses
[νεκρόκοσμους], the butchers and cooks: a still more terrible sight
is the same table _after_ the feast--for the wasted relics are even
more than the consumption. These victims, then, have given up their
lives uselessly. At other times, from mere niggardliness, the host
will grudge to distribute his dishes, and yet he grudged not to
deprive innocent beings of their existence!
“Well, I have taken away the excuse of those who allege that they
have the authority and sanction of Nature. For that man is not,
by nature, carnivorous is proved, in the first place, by the
external frame of his body--seeing that to none of the animals
designed for living on flesh has the human body any resemblance. He
has no curved beak, no sharp talons and claws, no pointed teeth,
no intense power of stomach [κοιλίας εὐτονία] or heat of blood
which might help him to masticate and digest the gross and tough
flesh-substance. On the contrary, by the smoothness of his teeth,
the small capacity of his mouth, the softness of his tongue, and
the sluggishness of his digestive apparatus, Nature sternly forbids
him [ἐξομνύται] to feed on flesh.
“If, in spite of all this, you still affirm that you were intended
by nature for such a diet, then, to begin with, kill _yourself_
what you wish to eat--but do it yourself with your own _natural_
weapons, without the use of butcher’s knife, or axe, or club. No;
as the wolves and lions and bears themselves slay all they feed on,
so, in like manner, do you kill the cow or ox with a gripe of your
jaws, or the pig with your teeth, or a hare or a lamb by falling
upon and rending them there and then. Having gone through all these
preliminaries, _then_ sit down to your repast. If, however, you
wait until the living and intelligent existence be deprived of
life, and if it would disgust you to have to rend out the heart and
shed the life-blood of your victim, why, I ask, in the very face
of Nature, and in despite of her, do you feed on beings endowed
with sentient life? But more than this--not even, after your
victims have been killed, will you eat them just as they are from
the slaughter-house. You boil, roast, and altogether metamorphose
them by fire and condiments. You entirely alter and disguise the
murdered animal by the use of ten thousand sweet herbs and spices,
that your natural taste may be deceived and be prepared to take the
unnatural food. A proper and witty rebuke was that of the Spartan
who bought a fish and gave it to his cook to dress. When the latter
asked for butter, and olive oil, and vinegar, he replied, ‘Why, if
I had all these things, I should not have bought the fish!’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account