The ethics of Hercules : $b A study of man's body as the sole determinant of ethical valuesGivler, Robert Chenault
Philosophy
The ethics of Hercules : $b A study of man's body as the sole determinant of ethical values
Givler, Robert Chenault
Ethics; Psychophysiology
Here the purpose involved, or the end sought, is neither praised
nor blamed. Nor have we indeed as yet reached any basis by which a
criterion of purposes and ends can be established. So far as we have
gone, “right” implies technique, and nothing more.
The members of this class are as follows:
13. The “right” information.
14. “Right” whale; the one to capture in order to get whalebone.
15. “Rub your sarsnet well, the _right_ way of the sarsnet.”
16. “Let it be a constant rule to scrub the boards the _right_
way of the grain, that is, lengthwise.”
17. “The ship ceased rolling and _righted_ herself.” (Compare
this signification with _perpendicular_, previously given.)
18. “Stand it _upright_, or it will fall.”
19. “Whose inhabitants were _right_ shooters (at an haires
breadth and faile not).”
20. “Swears he will shoot no more, but play with sparrows, And be
a boy _right_ out.”
21. “I am _right_ of mine old master’s humour for that.”
CLASS C
_“Right” as Descriptive of any Statement Which Reports the Facts;
of any Opinion or Judgment that is Correct; and of any Person Who
Judges, Thinks, or Acts in Accordance with the Facts or the Truth
about a Matter._[12]
It will be observed that the significations in this class are all
symptomatic of a slight change in the meaning of the concept “right.”
The emphasis here is upon true opinions and judgments in contrast to
false ones. Moreover, the range of behavior covered by Class C is
somewhat broader than that denoted by the two preceding classes. He
who now uses this word “right” becomes judicial, and makes statements
he is willing to defend. More than this we cannot say. We assume
many a time, no doubt, that the statements we call true are backed
by something not ourselves; and while in some cases nature’s laws
are in a sense “behind” our statements, yet unless this is the case,
there is nothing whatever to fall back upon. Thus, while a man may
demonstrate that dynamite is, as he says, truly explosive, yet in
cases of the equitable adjustment of social frictions, where both
parties pour out a tumult of exaggerations, no similar truth of
opinion is obtainable. It would therefore be illogical to assume
that we have reached any absolute criterion in passing from Class B
to Class C of “right.” He who uses this concept in this connection
has, indeed, ventured more than he who uses it only to imply the
preceding two classes, but he is not thereby gifted with superior
powers of discretion. All we can say is that he who undertakes to
make a judgment with all the available information before him is more
likely to be chosen as a referee again. He will at least have the
satisfaction of knowing that if he makes mistakes, they will probably
be some that he has never made before. And this way much of human
progress lies.
CLASS D
_“Right” as the Distinctive Epithet of the Hand Which is Normally
the Stronger._[13]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account