The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
If a man has been sterilized by vasectomy, restoration of function
and removal of the sterility seems practically always possible. If
a ligature has been used, releasing the ligature restores function.
Dr. William T. Belfield of Chicago[220] restored function fully by
removing the ligature eight weeks after it had been applied. In a
letter to me, Dr. Belfield said: "My observation accords with the
general experimental and clinical experience that the restoration of
the lumen after vasectomy or ligation, or both, is more certain than
the lasting occlusion of the vasa by these measures. The perseverance
of natural forces in restoring the lumen of the vas--and the success
achieved over such obstacles as silk ligatures--is surprising until
one reflects upon the natural factors favoring such restoration. In
one case I tied a waxed (to avoid cutting through) silk ligature
_tightly_ around the sheath of each vas; a specimen examined a month
later was devoid of sperms; one six months later contained plenty of
them. I cut down upon the ligatures, found them in place and neatly
encysted, and removed them. Evidently the pressure from behind had
squeezed a passage on at least one side. The gynecologists have
learned that ligatures around the Fallopian tubes are apt to cut
through, whereupon the tubal lumen is restored, though pressure
must be less than in the vas. Even when a piece of the vas has been
excised cases of spontaneous restoration have been observed in men
and dogs."[221]
[220] _Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc._, October 19, 1912.
[221] _Belfield, loc. cit._
When the ends of a cut vas are released from cicatricial tissue,
these ends may be sutured together; but as the lumen of the vas is
extremely small, there is sometimes obliteration by occlusion at
the juncture. Christian and Sanderson[222] described a method of
preventing this obliteration. A piece of No. 0 twenty-day catgut is
inserted three-eighths of an inch into each end of the vas, and these
ends are brought together by two catgut sutures, leaving the inserted
catgut in the canal. The ends heal together and the catgut in the
canal is absorbed. This method has been used successfully to join the
cut end of a Fallopian tube.
[222] _Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc._, December 13, 1913.
Gemelli[223] did vasectomy on eleven dogs and seven cats; about
six months later he reunited the cut ends, and on dissection found
restoration perfect, anatomically and functionally, in the eighteen
animals. The vas deferens in these animals is smaller than in man;
and therefore offers greater difficulty in the suturing. He used no
inserted catgut, but told me he employed the method Carrel applies in
joining cut arteries. In one case, where the dissection was broad,
he successfully inserted a piece of a vas taken from another animal.
Whether there is occlusion or not after end-to-end suturing depends
largely on the skill of the surgeon.
[223] _La Scuola Cattolica_, November, 1911.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account