The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
Dr. Edward Martin of the Pennsylvania University[224] and Delbet[225]
have removed sterility by effecting a patulous anastomosis between
the vas and the epididymis, and this method is applicable after
vasectomy by cutting, but it is not successful, as a rule. It has
been done effectively where the vas had no stricture. McKenna,[226]
in five attempts on men, succeeded once. Fürbringer[227] said that
in his experience with a thousand cases of double epididymis, the
condition is incurable in 80 per cent. of the gonorrheal infections.
[224] _University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin_, 1902, p.
388; 1903, xv, 2; _Therapeutic Gazette_, December 15, 1909.
[225] _Revue de Thérapeutique Médico-chirurgicale_, January 15,
1912.
[226] _Journal Amer. Med. Assoc._, January 26, 1915.
[227] _Deutsche med. Wochenschrift_, xxxix, 29.
Apart from the so-called vasectomy law, gynecologists quite
frequently sterilize women who have chronic heart disease,
tuberculosis, nephritis, diabetes, or hereditary mental taints.
Some men, like Spinelli, Cramer, Polak, and others, would sterilize
also in chronic anemia, persistent albuminuria, epilepsy, syphilis,
contracted pelvis, diseases of metabolism, infections, and
cirrhosis of the liver. There are several methods of sterilizing
women--removal of the ovaries, ligation of the Fallopian tubes,
resection of portions of the tubes, resection of the whole tube on
each side, cutting the tubes and burying the cut end in the tissues
by various methods, and destruction of the lining of the uterus by
vaporization or the thermocautery. De Tarnowsky[228] describes the
various methods. Some ligations and short resections have failed
to sterilize. When the ovaries or uterus are removed, or the major
part of the tubes are resected, or the lining of the uterus has
been destroyed, the sterilization is permanent. Almost certainly
function could be restored where the resection of the tubes is not
too destructive. Apart from the matter of mutilation, the effects of
double oöphorectomy are very grave,[229] and removal of the uterus
or the ovaries merely for sterilization is not only immoral, but
altogether unjustifiable scientifically.
[228] _Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc._, April 19, 1913.
[229] See the chapter on Gonorrhea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account