The Ethics of Medical Homicide and MutilationO'Malley, Austin
Religion
The Ethics of Medical Homicide and Mutilation
O'Malley, Austin
Medical ethics
Since the natural law evidently prescribes that man must live in
society and that the human race which constitutes this society,
is to be preserved by the generation of new human beings who will
replace those that die, or are made useless by disease or other
accident, whatever tends to this sustention of humanity according to
the natural law, and in the proper conditions, is good, and whatever
tends to the destruction of humanity is evil and to be avoided.
The generation of new replacing human beings must take place only in
the state of marriage, because thus solely the wife and the child
are protected, the children are educated physically, mentally and
morally, and the degradation and bestiality of promiscuous sexual
relationship are averted. The first and principal end of marriage is
the procreation of children. That end of marriage must be the end on
which is founded primarily the natural necessity for this contract,
but the natural necessity for the contract is the propagation of the
human kind through lawful generation and education. Marriage, too, in
its very nature is fitted for that chief end, and for that end it was
instituted by the Author of nature--a stable, perpetual association
of the sexes for the attainment of what is requisite for the
propagation of mankind. There are secondary ends of marriage, such
as a reciprocal love and help of the husband and wife, and also that
aspect of marriage which makes it a restraint upon promiscuous lust.
These last, however, are not enough to justify marriage in themselves
without the first or chief end, which is the procreation of children.
Whatever is subversive of the end of marriage, and that is the
propagation of mankind, is subversive of the very foundation of human
society, is contrary to the nature of man, frustrates the primal
function of nature, and is therefore essentially and always evil,
as bestiality, sodomy, or incest are evil. Such is birth control as
ordinarily practised. Birth control if it is effective through a
reciprocal consent of a wedded couple, for grave reason, and solely
by mutual abstention from the _debitum_ may be in certain conditions
an indifferent act morally. If, however, birth control is effected
by contraceptive drugs, or like methods, it is a crime against
nature, and always a crime which no circumstance can excuse, no
more than no circumstance can excuse bestiality, sodomy, or incest.
Secondly, marriage, which was instituted primarily to perpetuate the
creative act of God, when such practices prevail degenerates to mere
concubinage, a gratification of lust protected from the police. Such
practices, moreover, lower man and woman below the brutes, because
brutes do not frustrate the natural law except in the case of the
male rat and a few other low grade rodents and boar pigs. Onan is the
patron of Birth Control advocates. The Book of Genesis said Onan, the
son of Judah, "did a detestable thing, therefore the Lord slew him."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account