The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
Mr. Coleman says that to pay a man for writing against the late
Administration was a crime. He will allow that the application of
the rule will be just when applied to the present Administration.
We then say that Mr. Coleman receives the wages of sin; for he is
in every sense of the word paid for writing _against_ the present
Administration. The establishment at the head of which he is, is
said not to be his _own_; it is said to belong to a company, of
which General Hamilton is one. The paper was commenced for the
avowed purpose of opposing the Administration. Mr. Coleman, it is
believed, receives a yearly salary for writing for it, and for his
wages he is bound to write against the Administration, whether the
sentiments he pens accord with his own or not. He runs no risk,
he has no responsibility upon his shoulders. He may, in fact, be
called a mere hireling.
Coleman replied:
Cheetham says that the establishment of the _Evening Post_ does not
belong to the editor, but to a company, of which General Hamilton
is one; and that the editor receives a yearly salary for writing
for it. Now, though we do not perceive that this is of much
consequence in any way but to the editor’s pocket ... we shall not
permit it to pass uncontradicted. We therefore declare that _not
one word of it is true_. The establishment of the _Evening Post_
is, and always since its commencement has been, the sole property
of the editor: it does not, nor did it ever, belong to a company,
or to General Hamilton, or to any one else but the editor; and
lastly, the editor is not a _hireling_, nor has he at any period of
his life received _wages for writing_.
Not at all discomfited, the Jeffersonian organ remarked--and hit near
the truth--that the journal had probably been given to Coleman by the
men who were known to have raised large sums to found it. Certainly
Coleman until after 1804 was hardly a free agent. The distinction and
prosperity of his newspaper depended largely upon Hamilton’s good will.
He gladly served the statesman whom he called “my best earthly friend,
my ablest adviser, and my most generous and disinterested patron,” but
he had no real alternative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account