The Evening Post: A Century of JournalismNevins, Allan
History
The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism
Nevins, Allan
New York post
The stand taken by Bryant’s friend Chase, the poet’s natural
generosity, and the reports of a desire for reconciliation sent by
Southern correspondents, caused the paper to assume an unflinching
advocacy of President Johnson’s mild policy, and to attack the harsh
measures of Congress. In this attitude the _Times_ was with it. The
_Tribune_ took the other side vehemently, and, in a more reasonable
way, it was espoused by the city’s three great weekly organs of
opinion, E. L. Godkin’s _Nation_, _Harper’s Weekly_, and the
_Independent_, from which Henry Ward Beecher, disagreeing with Theodore
Tilton’s severe views, soon resigned.
Into the _Evening Post’s_ opinions upon the whole kaleidoscopic
succession of bills and acts bearing upon reconstruction, from 1865
to 1868, it is impossible to go in detail. Its fundamental doctrine
was fully outlined as early as May 2, 1865. The two great objects, it
affirmed, were to depart as little as possible from the old-established
principles of State government, and “to do nothing for revenge, nothing
in the mere spirit of proscription.” It believed that a convention
should be called in each State to annul the ordinance of secession,
and, by writing a new State Constitution, to repudiate the rebel debt,
guarantee the negroes equal civil rights, and regulate the elective
franchise according to immutable principles of certain application,
discarding all arbitrary and capricious rules. The States should also
ratify the anti-slavery amendment of the Federal Constitution by
popular vote. “As soon as the political power has thus been regularly
reconstituted the State, as a matter of course, resumes her relations
to the Union, elects members of Congress, and stands in all respects on
a footing with the States” of the North.
Urging this policy, Bryant and the _Evening Post_ wished to end
military rule at the South as quickly as possible, while the
Congressional radicals, led by Wade and Thaddeus Stevens, like the
_Tribune_ and _Nation_, regarded its indefinite continuance as
necessary. The _Evening Post_ held that the illiterate negroes were
unfit to vote and should be required to pass through a probationary
period; it wished the Southern ballot based upon an educational test.
The _Tribune_ and the _Sun_ supported full negro suffrage. When the
first Southern States sent Representatives to Congress the _Evening
Post_, like the _Times_ and _World_, wished them admitted. The _World_,
indeed, bitterly assailed the “rump” Congress which barred them. The
_Evening Post_, _Times_, and _World_ supported Johnson’s veto of the
Freedmen’s Bureau bill, while the _Tribune_ wrung its hands over such
journalistic depravity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account